(TORONTO) Toronto police arrested 10 people on September 13, 2025, after clashes broke out between two opposing immigration demonstrations at Christie Pits Park, a site long tied to protest history, including an antisemitic riot in 1933. The day featured a faceoff between a nationalist Canada First Rally calling for stricter immigration controls and deportations, and a counter-protest branded “No to Hate, Yes to Immigrants!” that backed newcomers and framed immigration as a strength for Canada 🇨🇦.
Hundreds gathered on both sides. Tensions rose as groups traded chants and moved closer to one another. Police formed lines to keep the camps apart and later confirmed that one man was arrested for assault, while officers detained nine others for offenses that officials said would be detailed in a forthcoming release.

Videos of shoving, shouting, and brief scuffles spread quickly online, showing how charged the atmosphere became despite repeated warnings to step back.
Positions and Participants
- The Canada First Rally framed its cause as a defense of “Canadian values,” pushing for lower immigration levels and tougher border controls. Organizer Joe Anidjar said the movement aims to preserve Canadian history and culture without violence and stressed that people have the right to voice opinions that others may not like.
- Counter-protesters arrived earlier in the day. They urged neighbors to support immigrants and to reject hate, arguing that newcomers help build strong communities and contribute to the economy.
Police Response and Arrests
Toronto Police maintained a heavy presence at Christie Pits, using officers and barriers to separate the two camps and to break up hot spots before they spread.
- The force said it acted to keep the peace and to protect the right to lawful protest.
- Officials emphasized that violence would lead to arrest, regardless of the message or group involved.
- The police reported 10 arrests, confirming one for assault, and said details on the remaining nine would be released soon.
The choice of Christie Pits, given its link to the 1933 riot, added symbolic weight. Organizers on both sides were aware of that history: for counter-protesters, marching there felt like a stand against past and present hate; for Canada First supporters, the park’s legacy did not alter their calls for order and cultural continuity.
Police said they will keep monitoring similar events to prevent violence and ensure lawful assembly does not put the wider public at risk. Officials urged residents to follow updates through trusted channels. For formal statements and alerts, the public can check the Toronto Police Service website, which posts news and contact details for media and community questions.
“We are neutral on ideas but firm on behavior,” police said, describing their approach to handling opposing demonstrations.
Political and Policy Context
No policy changes were announced after the confrontations, but the day reflected a broader debate over immigration levels, border security, and settlement planning across Canada.
- The Canada First Rally included calls for “remigration” and mass deportations—language that provoked strong pushback from immigrant-supporting groups.
- The counter-protest’s message—“No to Hate, Yes to Immigrants”—centered on inclusion and on the belief that immigrants strengthen Canada’s social and economic fabric.
National policy debates commonly center on:
- Housing and how intake ties to supply and local capacity
- Health-care capacity
- Labor-market needs
Supporters of stricter controls argue that rapid population growth strains public services and budgets, and that lower admissions would ease pressure while giving time to expand housing and infrastructure. Opponents counter that newcomers fill key jobs, start businesses, and keep communities vibrant—especially as Canada’s population ages. They say the real fixes are better planning, such as:
- Building homes faster
- Speeding up credential recognition
- Funding transit and clinics to match growth
Christie Pits has become a case study in how these arguments play out in public space. The park’s history raises questions about balancing protections against harmful speech with safeguarding lawful assembly. Toronto Police described their approach as neutral on ideas but firm on behavior—supporting free speech while acting against violence—and said that balance will likely guide future events as both groups plan more rallies.
Community Impact and Responses
Community leaders warn that fallout from confrontations can linger:
- Families with recent arrivals may fear weekend programs near protests.
- Workers on temporary permits may worry heated rhetoric paints them as problems instead of neighbors.
- Some residents concerned about fast growth feel shut out and turn to rallies to be heard.
Bridging these divides requires careful planning and steady communication. Practical measures suggested by officials and service groups include:
- Clear protest rules and early police outreach to organizers
- Separate entry points and trained peace marshals
- Rapid reminders from organizers about ground rules when speakers use charged language
- Prompt, factual police updates after events to limit rumors
According to analysis by VisaVerge.com, high-profile moments like these shape public opinion faster than technical reports or committee hearings. They can pressure city and federal leaders to respond. In Ottawa, any shift in national targets or enforcement priorities would go through formal processes, but officials also track local flashpoints to see how policies land on the ground.
What Comes Next
Both camps plan to continue organizing:
- Canada First Rally supporters say they will:
- Push for reduced immigration
- Advocate stricter screening
- Seek deportations for people without status
- Counter-protest groups plan to:
- Hold more community events
- Offer legal clinics
- Issue public statements under the “No to Hate, Yes to Immigrants” banner
Policymakers face calls to address three practical areas:
- Admissions planning: tie intake to housing supply and local capacity while maintaining family unity and humanitarian duties
- Border and enforcement choices: ensure clear processes for removals where required by law, while safeguarding due process and safety
- Integration: invest in language classes, job matching, and faster recognition of skills so newcomers can work at appropriate levels quickly
City officials and service groups also stress small steps to lower tensions, such as clear protest rules, separation strategies, and post-event factual communications.
Media Coverage and Reach
Local media outlets—including CityNews Calgary, Global News, CTV, and The Canadian Press—reported large crowds and fast police interventions as confrontations flared. Videos from the scene traveled widely online, amplifying the events beyond Toronto.
- That reach can discourage violence by showing consequences for misconduct.
- It can also attract larger crowds to future rallies.
For people living and working near Christie Pits—small business owners, parents scheduling weekend matches, long-time residents—the hope is simple: peaceful protest, firm but fair policing, and a community that can debate policy without turning on itself.
Police said they will continue to monitor gatherings, separate opposing groups when needed, and arrest those who commit crimes. Organizers on both sides say they will return. With both the Canada First Rally and the “No to Hate, Yes to Immigrants” coalition preparing more public actions, Toronto may see further test cases of how a diverse city manages difficult debates in shared spaces.
Frequently Asked Questions
This Article in a Nutshell
On September 13, 2025, Toronto police arrested 10 people after clashes at Christie Pits Park between the nationalist Canada First Rally and the “No to Hate, Yes to Immigrants” counter-protest. Hundreds attended both demonstrations where tensions escalated into shoving and brief scuffles captured on video. Police formed lines, used barriers, and stressed neutrality on ideas while enforcing behavior standards; one person was arrested for assault and nine others detained pending details. The park’s 1933 riot history added symbolism. No immediate policy changes followed, but both sides plan more events. Officials urged calm, better planning, and clear communications to reduce risks at future gatherings.