Key Takeaways
• Oklahoma Senate panel rejected rules on student immigration checks and teacher Naturalization Test on May 7, 2025.
• Federal law and Supreme Court rulings bar schools from asking about students’ immigration status or requiring unrelated teacher tests.
• Bipartisan lawmakers, teachers, and parents expressed strong legal and community opposition, citing risks of discrimination and teacher shortages.
On May 7, 2025, an Oklahoma Senate panel made up of both Republicans and Democrats decided not to allow two new education rules from State Superintendent Ryan Walters to take effect. These rules were about checking the immigration status of students in public schools and a requirement for teachers to pass the U.S. Naturalization Test before working in classrooms. The decision has drawn attention throughout Oklahoma 🇺🇸 and across the country, raising important questions about immigration, education, and the rights of children and teachers in public schools.
The Rules the Panel Rejected
Immigration Status Rule
The first rule the panel rejected was about making public schools in Oklahoma ask students for proof of U.S. citizenship or legal residency. If the rule had passed, schools would have needed to check every child’s paperwork at enrollment and count up those who couldn’t prove citizenship or legal status. Schools would then have been required to report these numbers to the state’s education department.
Ryan Walters, the state superintendent, argued that this rule was supposed to help schools know how many students may need extra help, such as English learner programs. He said, “We’re trying to make sure we know who our students are, so we can give them the right services.” However, Walters also said that if the state collected this information and federal authorities asked for it, his office would hand it over. He went even further, publicly supporting the idea of letting immigration enforcement officers conduct raids in local schools.
This rule was not popular. It drew criticism from people on both sides of the political aisle, and many community members were worried and upset. Governor Kevin Stitt and several lawmakers spoke out against it, as did many Latino leaders and families concerned about their children’s rights and privacy. Teachers, school leaders, and parents also expressed fear that children might be singled out or less likely to come to school if the rule went into effect.
A big reason for these strong reactions was the worry that the rule would go against federal law. In particular:
- Federal rules make it clear that schools cannot ask students if they have legal status in the country.
- In 1982, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the famous case Plyler v. Doe that every child, no matter their immigration status, has a right to a public education.
- When Alabama 🇺🇸 tried a similar law in 2011, which required schools to check immigration paperwork, it was challenged in court and later struck down.
By proposing this rule, Walters set off a debate that grew far beyond a simple school policy. The situation showed how actions at the state level can sometimes clash with national laws, and why it’s often so hard to change rules about immigration and schools.
Teacher Naturalization Test Rule
The second rule, also rejected by the Oklahoma Senate panel, would have required all teachers in public schools to pass the U.S. Naturalization Test. This is the same written exam that people take when they want to become American citizens. The test covers American history, civics, and how the government works.
Superintendent Walters said this rule would make sure teachers know about U.S. history and government. But many lawmakers and education leaders worried that making teachers take the test would cause more problems than it solved. They argued:
- The teacher pipeline in Oklahoma 🇺🇸 is already under pressure, with many districts struggling to find enough certified teachers to fill classrooms.
- Adding another test, especially one flagged as unrelated to teaching skills, could scare off good teachers or keep experienced educators from working.
- The U.S. Naturalization Test, while important for new citizens, is not designed to measure teaching ability or classroom skills.
The Naturalization Test usually includes questions like the number of U.S. senators, the name of the Speaker of the House, or details about the Constitution. Critics wondered if making teachers pass the test actually improved student learning. Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers agreed that it was not the answer and that it could make teacher shortages worse.
The Legislative Process That Blocked the Rules
The Oklahoma Senate panel used a resolution called Senate Joint Resolution 22 to officially reject these new rules. Senator Micheal Bergstrom, a Republican from Adair who leads the Senate Administrative Rules Committee, filed this resolution. He worked closely with Representative Gerrid Kendrix, another Republican from Altus, to write the language.
During their meeting on May 7, the Senate Administrative Rules Committee voted on each part of the proposal. They made several line-item rejections, which means they looked at each part of Walters’ plan and said no to the ones they didn’t like. They completely blocked the immigration status requirement, along with the teacher Naturalization Test rule.
This bipartisan vote is important because it showed agreement across party lines. Lawmakers, school leaders, and many members of the public all saw these rules as too extreme or not useful for solving real problems in schools. The Senate panel’s decision stopped these rules from taking effect, at least for now.
Strong Opposition from Many Sides
Legal Concerns
One of the biggest issues with the immigration status rule was that it seemed to go against well-known federal rules. Here are the main legal reasons the rule was seen as a problem:
- The Department of Education, which oversees all public schools in the United States 🇺🇸, says schools cannot ask about or record student immigration status. Schools can ask about a child’s age and where they live to figure out which school they should go to, but they cannot risk making a student afraid to register.
- In the Plyler v. Doe case, the U.S. Supreme Court said that a state can’t deny any child access to public education, no matter their immigration status.
- When Alabama 🇺🇸 passed a law making schools collect information about students’ residency in 2011, it caused confusion and made many students stop coming to school. After a lawsuit, the courts decided the law was not allowed.
By trying to collect this information, Oklahoma 🇺🇸 could have faced legal challenges from civil rights groups or the U.S. government. Opponents said the rule might have put Oklahoma schools at risk of lawsuits and losing federal funds.
Community and Political Reaction
The reaction to the proposed rules was strong and often emotional. Latino organizations inside Oklahoma 🇺🇸 spoke out against the rules, saying they might make Latino and immigrant families feel unwelcome or fearful. Some parents worried their children would be treated differently at school just because of the paperwork their family could or couldn’t show.
Governor Kevin Stitt, a Republican, refused to support the rules. Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers agreed that the rules created more problems than they solved. As reported by VisaVerge.com, most thought the immigration status rule did not respect federal law and would only lead to confusion and discrimination. The teacher Naturalization Test rule was not seen as helpful for improving teaching or learning in schools.
During public meetings, many residents described their experience and fears about what would happen if the rules went ahead. Some said families might stop sending their kids to school. Others said good teachers might quit their jobs rather than take a test they believed was irrelevant.
Teachers and School Districts Weigh In
Oklahoma’s public schools already face many challenges, including teacher shortages, especially in rural areas. School leaders said that adding another test for teachers, especially one not connected to how well teachers help students, did not make sense.
Teacher groups pointed out that the U.S. Naturalization Test is meant for people who want to become U.S. citizens, not for professionals whose job is already to help children learn. They said keeping good teachers in Oklahoma 🇺🇸 was more important than making them pass yet another test.
Broader Context and What’s Next
The rejection of these two rules is part of a bigger debate about how states handle immigration issues in schools. Across the country, different states have tried to pass new rules to control who goes to school and who can teach. Many times, these efforts run into problems because education policy must still follow national laws and Supreme Court decisions.
In the case of Oklahoma 🇺🇸, Senate Joint Resolution 22 sent a message that lawmakers want to avoid breaking federal law or driving students and teachers away from public schools. If Oklahoma had gone ahead with these rules, there was a real risk the U.S. Department of Education would step in or that civil rights groups would file lawsuits.
The move also shows the power of bipartisan action. Both Republicans and Democrats joined together to reject the rules. They listened to the public, teachers, and legal experts before deciding that these rules were not the right way to use state power over schools.
What This Means for Students, Teachers, and Parents
For Students
The panel’s decision should make all students, no matter where they were born or their immigration status, feel safer about going to school. School staff are not allowed to ask about a child’s legal status, and every child can enroll, just as the Supreme Court ordered in Plyler v. Doe.
For Teachers
Qualified teachers do not have to take the U.S. Naturalization Test to keep or get their jobs in Oklahoma 🇺🇸. The focus will stay on hiring teachers who have the right skills and training for the classroom, without adding new requirements that don’t have to do with teaching.
For Parents
Parents can register their children for public school without worrying about paperwork related to immigration status. Schools cannot require proof of citizenship or legal residency from families. If parents or guardians want more information about their rights or about public education, they can visit the U.S. Department of Education’s official site for resources and answers.
Different Opinions
Not everyone agrees about the best way to set rules for schools, especially when it comes to immigration. Some still believe schools should have more control over who can enroll or teach. Others argue that any rule making students feel excluded goes against American 🇺🇸 values and laws.
The debate over Superintendent Ryan Walters’ proposed rules is likely to continue, especially with immigration a hot topic in state and national politics. For now, though, Oklahoma’s bipartisan panel has made it clear: the state’s schools must welcome all students and should not put up new barriers for teachers.
Conclusion
The Oklahoma Senate panel’s rejection of Ryan Walters’ education rules—especially the rules about checking student immigration status and forcing teachers to take the U.S. Naturalization Test—marks a key moment for public education in Oklahoma 🇺🇸. The decision respects federal law, follows Supreme Court rulings, and puts the focus back on helping all students.
As the country continues to discuss how best to handle immigration and public education, this example shows how state lawmakers can listen to legal experts, parents, and teachers before making major decisions. For more detailed updates on how immigration laws affect schools, VisaVerge.com offers clear coverage and expert analysis. As always, families, teachers, and students are encouraged to learn their rights and know where to go for help or more information.
Learn Today
Naturalization Test → An exam on U.S. history, civics, and government, required for immigrants seeking U.S. citizenship.
Plyler v. Doe → A 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that ensured all children access to public education, regardless of immigration status.
Senate Joint Resolution 22 → The official legislative action used by Oklahoma’s Senate panel to reject proposed education rules.
Legal Residency → The status of living in a country with official governmental authorization; often requires documentation.
Bipartisan → Involving members or agreement from both major political parties, such as Democrats and Republicans.
This Article in a Nutshell
On May 7, 2025, Oklahoma’s Senate panel stopped two education rules: one for checking student immigration status, and another requiring teachers to pass the U.S. Naturalization Test. Their rejection, supported by both parties, upholds student and teacher rights, follows federal law, and prevents barriers in public education statewide.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• UK Immigration Rules to Demand Fluent English for Work Visas
• Canada under Mark Carney signals steady course for Immigration Levels Plan
• Quebec sees high immigration as fertility rates hit historic low
• Dale City’s Henrry Josue Villatoro Santos gets immigration hearing
• Business executives expect immigration enforcement to affect workplaces
