- Japan now shares personal data of deportable foreign nationals with local municipalities without requiring explicit consent.
- The policy provides monthly updates and annual lists including names, addresses, and nationalities to local authorities.
- Officials claim the data improves service delivery for education and health while human rights advocates warn of increased surveillance.
Japan began sharing personal data on foreign nationals facing removal with local municipalities in July, giving them names, addresses, nationalities and dates of birth for people living in their communities. The policy replaces a system that generally required explicit consent before authorities could pass along the information.
The monthly disclosures cover foreign nationals subject to deportation proceedings, while a broader annual list will be supplied every June. Japan’s Immigration Services Agency says the arrangement will promote coordination between national and local authorities.
Free toolUSCIS Receipt Number Decoder
The change reaches people living outside immigration detention facilities. At the end of 2025, Japan recorded 7,722 foreign nationals with active deportation orders. That total included 2,429 people on provisional release and 1,546 under the “sponsorship system” as of December 2025.
The data gives municipalities information they often did not have. Resident registration was typically revoked after a deportation order, leaving local authorities without a complete record of affected residents.
Justice Minister Hiroshi Hiraguchi addressed the policy at a news conference on July 31, 2026. He said the government would balance enforcement with protections for the people whose information it distributes.
“The government will implement the necessary measures while giving full consideration to the human rights of foreign nationals across all initiatives.”
Municipal services and removal monitoring now share the same data
Japanese authorities describe the disclosures as a way to improve local responses. Municipal offices can use the information when arranging compulsory education and vaccinations for children of people facing removal.
The same system also gives municipalities a clearer view of people who could otherwise disappear from official local records. The government has linked the policy to its effort to prevent foreign nationals from avoiding removal by moving through communities without municipal oversight.
That dual purpose has drawn criticism. Human rights advocates have warned that distributing sensitive personal information without consent could increase surveillance and discrimination at the local level.
The policy therefore places local governments between two functions: helping residents obtain services and supporting a national removal system. The information includes identity and residence details, not merely aggregate figures.
The Takaichi government folded the program into a wider enforcement plan
The data-sharing policy forms part of the Sanae Takaichi administration’s “Zero Illegal Foreign Residents Plan.” The plan seeks to strengthen monitoring and accelerate removals, making municipal information-sharing one element of a broader enforcement approach.
Japan’s Second Basic Plan for Immigration Control also points to additional identification and screening measures. Those include JESTA, a pre-travel authorization system scheduled for introduction by 2028, and plans to integrate residence cards with “My Number” identification cards.
The residence-card integration is intended to streamline tracking across government systems. JESTA would operate before travel, while the municipal disclosures concern foreign nationals already living in Japan and subject to removal measures.
The disclosure schedule makes oversight routine
The program’s structure moves information-sharing from an exceptional, consent-based process to a recurring administrative practice. Municipalities receive updates every month, then a comprehensive list each June.
That schedule gives local offices repeated access to the status of affected residents. It also creates regular points at which identity, address and nationality information can circulate between the central government and local departments.
The affected population is not limited to people held in immigration facilities. The figures for provisional release and the sponsorship system show that thousands of people with active orders live in the community while their cases remain subject to immigration control.
The government’s stated objective is cooperation. Its implementation also expands the number of public bodies handling personal information tied to deportation decisions.
The next phase of Japan’s system is expected in 2028, when the government plans to introduce JESTA and continue integrating immigration records with national identification infrastructure.
This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified immigration attorney about your specific case.
