Key Takeaways
• Judge Williams blocked Florida’s immigration law on April 4, 2025, stating only federal authorities control immigration enforcement.
• Florida law enforcement continued making at least 15 arrests after the restraining order, including a wrongful arrest of a U.S. citizen.
• Judge Williams extended the restraining order, warning stronger measures could follow if state officials ignored federal court instructions.
Florida officials have heightened their criticism of federal Judge Kathleen Williams after she blocked a state immigration law that criminalized undocumented immigrants entering Florida following an illegal crossing into the United States 🇺🇸. This situation has become more serious as reports show that law enforcement in Florida continued making arrests even after the judge’s clear order to stop. The struggle between state leaders and the federal courts is bringing more attention to the ongoing debate over who has the right to enforce immigration law in the United States.
What Happened: The Judicial Order
On April 4, 2025, U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams, based in Miami, issued a restraining order that stopped Florida from making arrests using its new immigration law. She said the law was not valid because immigration is something only the federal government can control. Judge Williams directly ordered “the state and its officers, agents, employees, attorneys, and any person who are in active concert or participation with them” to stop enforcing the law. She said this was required by the Constitution and by the long-standing rule that states cannot pass their own laws about who can or cannot be in the country.
Judge Williams made it clear that only federal officials, like immigration agents, have the power to arrest people in the United States 🇺🇸 for breaking immigration laws. Her 14-day restraining order was meant to give time for the courts to look at the law more carefully and decide its future, making sure that the rights of everyone involved were protected during this time.
Arrests Despite the Order
Despite Judge Williams’ clear order, Florida officers kept enforcing the law. News reports confirmed that at least 15 arrests took place in just two weeks after the restraining order:
- 13 in Leon County
- 1 in Orange County
- 1 in Hillsborough County
In a hearing, Judge Williams said she was “astounded” that police had kept making arrests. She paid special attention to a case where a person born in Georgia, a U.S. citizen, was arrested under the state law by the Florida Highway Patrol. This man was kept in jail for two days in Tallahassee before the charges were dropped by a county judge. Judge Williams said this mistake showed the dangers of letting state officers act as immigration agents, pointing out that someone’s rights were violated in a way that would not have happened with proper respect for the law.
State Officials Push Back
Top Florida leaders, including Governor Ron DeSantis, have not accepted the judge’s order quietly. Governor DeSantis criticized Judge Williams directly, saying that her decision was wrong and that she did not have the right to stop the state’s actions.
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier said in a statement on May 3, 2025, “We believe the court has overstepped and lacks jurisdiction here, and I will not tell law enforcement to stop fulfilling their constitutional [duties].” This means he believes that state police officers are still responsible for protecting the state, even when it comes to immigration law, and that Florida does not have to listen to the federal court in this case.
Lawyers for the state have also argued that the original restraining order did not apply to the Florida Highway Patrol. They claim that some officers are not directly named in the judge’s order, allowing them to keep enforcing the law. This argument is being closely watched in the legal world, as it brings up important questions about how far a judge’s order can go and who has the final say in controlling immigration. Analysis from VisaVerge.com suggests these legal disputes almost always test the limits of what states can do compared to the powers of the federal government.
Judge Williams’ Response to Violations
When it became public that officers were still arresting people, Judge Williams did not immediately punish state officials, but she did take steps to make her order even stronger. She extended her 14-day restraining order for another 11 days and set a new court date for April 29, 2025. This gave more time for all sides to prepare their cases and make sure everyone understood the law.
In her updated order, Judge Williams made it very clear: both the most senior state officials and regular police officers were required to follow her instructions. She stopped just short of holding anyone in contempt of court—that is, officially declaring that someone had ignored a judge’s lawful direction—but she made clear that next time, stronger measures might be used.
This legal standoff has shown the ongoing struggle between state rights and the powers of the federal government, especially over an issue as controversial as immigration. Judge Williams warned that the state’s actions could create confusion, lead to wrongful arrests, and hurt people who were supposed to be protected by federal law.
Broader Context: Immigration Law Battles
U.S. immigration law has always been a source of debate between the federal government—that is, the national government that covers all of the United States 🇺🇸—and individual states like Florida. The Supreme Court has ruled before that only the federal government can decide who can come to, stay in, or be removed from the country. This idea is called “federal preemption,” which means states cannot create their own rules about things the U.S. Constitution says only the national government can control.
Judge Williams’ order is based on this principle. She, like other judges before her, has said that if states pass laws that punish people for immigration violations, these laws are likely not valid. This is because they interfere with what Congress has already decided. For more information about federal immigration law and the responsibilities of each government, you can visit the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s overview of immigration laws.
In recent years, states like Florida have passed more laws related to immigration. These laws often face lawsuits, and courts must decide if they fit within the larger legal system of the United States 🇺🇸. Supporters of state laws say that local authorities need tools to handle increased migration, while critics argue these laws cause confusion, discrimination, and even harm U.S. citizens who are wrongly targeted.
Impact on Immigrants and the Community
The ongoing fight between Florida officials and the federal courts has a big effect on immigrants, their families, and local communities. People who are living in Florida, whether legally or not, may worry about being stopped by police or arrested, even if they have done nothing wrong.
The story of the U.S. citizen arrested in Tallahassee shows how mistakes can happen when local law enforcement tries to enforce complex federal rules. Even though he should never have been arrested under an immigration law, he spent two days in jail. This example, highlighted by Judge Williams, shows why it matters who is in charge of making and enforcing immigration law.
Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other immigrant rights advocates have raised concerns that Florida’s actions could encourage racial profiling, where people are stopped or arrested mainly because of how they look or where they were born. These groups say that when police enforce immigration law, it can create fear in immigrant communities, making people less likely to report crimes or work with law enforcement to keep neighborhoods safe.
State vs. Federal Power: What’s at Stake?
This conflict is about more than one law or one state. It raises big questions about how the United States 🇺🇸 divides power between the federal government and the states. The Constitution says that the national government has control over international issues, including who can come into and stay in the country. But Florida leaders say they need to act if they feel the federal government is not handling illegal immigration well.
Florida’s arguments are part of a larger national debate. Other states have also tried passing their own laws about immigrants. Sometimes, courts have allowed state laws that deal with criminal actions that are not connected to immigration. But laws that directly punish people only because of their immigration status are almost always blocked for going against federal control.
The ongoing hearings in Miami will likely set the stage for more court cases in the future. Immigration law experts expect that if the courts agree with Judge Kathleen Williams, Florida will be forced to stop trying to enforce these types of laws. If the courts decide with Florida officials, other states might feel encouraged to pass similar legislation.
Political and Public Debate in Florida
Governor Ron DeSantis and other top state leaders have made immigration law a major issue for voters. They say Florida has the right to keep residents safe and stop illegal immigration, especially if they think federal authorities are not doing enough.
By criticizing Judge Williams, these officials are sending a strong message that they will not accept what they see as an overreach by the federal government. Supporters in Florida argue that the state is only doing what is necessary to protect its interests. Critics, however, warn that ignoring a court order and wrongly arresting U.S. citizens are signs of why the state should not be making its own immigration rules.
The courts will need to decide how far a judge’s order can go. If Judge Williams’ power is seen as limited, other states may try to test the boundaries, setting up more legal battles across the country. As these cases work their way through the system, the stakes remain high for immigrants, law enforcement, and state and federal officials alike.
Next Steps: What to Expect
With the new hearing set for April 29, 2025, both sides are preparing to argue their positions. The extended restraining order means that, for now, officers in Florida are not allowed to arrest people under the immigration law that was blocked. Judge Williams’ firm response suggests that continued violations could lead to contempt of court charges, which are serious punishments that can include fines or jail time for those who break a judge’s order.
As reported by VisaVerge.com, all eyes will be on the next court session and how Judge Williams chooses to handle any further violations. The United States 🇺🇸 has faced similar conflicts before, and each time, the courts play a key role in making sure the balance between state and federal power is maintained.
For everyone involved—immigrants, law enforcement, and the general public in Florida—the outcome will have real effects on how immigration law is enforced, who has the final say, and whether similar battles may arise in other parts of the country. Many experts and members of the public are watching to see if Judge Kathleen Williams’ rulings become a turning point in how states try to deal with immigration, and whether federal courts will stand firm in reminding everyone that the Constitution sets clear rules about who is in charge.
The coming weeks will be important, not just for Florida, but for the entire country. These court battles could shape how immigration law is handled and how federal and state powers are balanced well into the future.
Learn Today
Restraining Order → A court-ordered directive stopping certain actions, in this case, prohibiting Florida from enforcing its challenged immigration law.
Federal Preemption → A legal principle where federal laws override conflicting state laws, especially in areas the Constitution reserves for federal authority.
Contempt of Court → A finding that someone ignored or disobeyed a lawful court order, which can result in penalties or fines.
Racial Profiling → When authorities target individuals for arrest or investigation based primarily on race, ethnicity, or nationality rather than evidence.
Jurisdiction → The legal authority a court or government entity has to make decisions or enforce laws in a designated area or issue.
This Article in a Nutshell
Could local police arrest you for violating immigration law? In Florida, this question exploded after Judge Kathleen Williams blocked a sweeping state law, but law enforcement kept making arrests. These legal clashes highlight the tension between state power and federal immigration control, and the real impact on immigrant communities statewide.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• US Immigration phone scam targets student visa holders nationwide
• ACLU renews fight against Oklahoma Anti-Immigration Law in court
• Canada lowers immigration targets for skilled workers in 2025
• Kalamazoo group rallies for immigration reform at local theater
• New Zealand faces record exodus as net immigration drops sharply
