Carney calls for immigration cap to address Canada’s housing crisis

Key Takeaways

• Mark Carney proposes capping immigration at pre-pandemic levels to match available housing and public services.
• Canada placed a national cap on international student permits, causing major city rents to fall between 8–10%.
• Critics warn lowering immigration alone won’t fix the housing crisis without significant new home construction.

Mark Carney has recently become a key figure in Canada’s immigration debate, especially as it connects with the country’s growing housing crisis. The relationship between immigration and housing shortages is now at the center of Canada’s national conversation. Carney, who many expect will soon lead the country as Prime Minister, recommends capping immigration levels. He wants numbers to return to “sustainable pre-pandemic trends.” This approach is not about being against newcomers. Instead, Carney and supporters believe it will help balance population growth with the number of homes available, as well as with other public services.

This article goes into detail about Carney’s proposal, the government’s recent actions, likely short- and long-term effects, and the arguments from both sides. All of this helps explain why the connection between Carney, immigration, and housing has become so important for Canada 🇨🇦. The story is about much more than just numbers—it’s about where people live, who builds homes, and who gets a chance to settle in Canada 🇨🇦.

Carney’s Cap: Why Immigration Numbers Matter for Housing in Canada 🇨🇦

Carney has not provided a specific number for his cap. Instead, he wants all immigration—including permanent residents, international students, and temporary foreign workers—scaled back until the pace matches what Canada 🇨🇦 managed before the COVID-19 pandemic. According to Carney’s own policy documents and his statements from late 2024 and early 2025, this return to “sustainable” levels is necessary because population growth has outpaced the country’s ability to provide enough homes and essential services like healthcare.

Carney argues that recent policies allowed more immigrants, international students, and temporary workers into Canada 🇨🇦 than the country could support. This, he claims, led to more competition for rental apartments and homes. He also points to strained healthcare, social services, and city infrastructure, which have not kept up with the record growth.

He is quick to say that this idea should not be seen as anti-immigration. Instead, Carney insists that “capping immigration until it can be returned to its sustainable pre-pandemic trend” is a way to give Canada 🇨🇦 time to catch up, especially in building new housing.

Recent Steps: How Federal Policy is Shifting

Carney’s ideas are already showing up in current government actions. Under Immigration Minister Marc Miller, the Canadian government has started linking immigration targets to housing supply, and not just to economic goals. Some important examples of this recent shift:

• The Immigration Levels Plan for 2025–2027 now includes strict targets for both permanent immigrants and for temporary resident streams such as international students and temporary foreign workers. This is a clear signal that Canada 🇨🇦 wants to stabilize its population after the sharp post-pandemic increases.
• The population cap on temporary residents aims to bring their overall share down to 5% of the total Canadian population by 2026.
• In 2024, a national cap was placed on international student permits. Popular cities like Vancouver and Toronto saw rental prices fall by over 8–10% shortly afterward, creating hope that fewer newcomers could ease at least some housing pressure.
• There are new efforts to address worker shortages affecting homebuilding. For instance, the government is making it easier for undocumented construction workers to get legal status, so they can help build more homes.

All these steps have one thing in common: they try to connect the size of Canada’s population with its ability to house people. The guiding idea is that immigration levels should match the country’s current “domestic capacity”—in other words, only allow as many newcomers as there are enough homes and services for.

Expected Results: Can Lower Immigration Fix the Housing Crisis?

Policymakers, banks, and researchers have all weighed in on whether capping immigration can truly fix Canada’s housing challenges. Most agree that limiting the number of newcomers may help slow down growth in housing demand. For example:

• RBC reports that cutting immigration targets will reduce the pressure on the housing market. Ottawa’s own estimates show that lowering both permanent and temporary resident numbers could reduce Canada’s housing supply gap by as much as 670,000 units through 2027.
• The government expects to admit at least 20% fewer permanent residents, along with slashing non-permanent residents by nearly a million over two years. These moves are expected to help bring supply and demand closer together if the pace of new construction keeps up—or gets better.

Some early effects are already visible. After the cap on international student permits, rents fell in major cities. Fewer people looking for apartments means less competition, allowing prices to drop.

However, most experts warn that lowering immigration will not fully fix things. The main reason is that Canada 🇨🇦 has not been building enough homes, especially affordable ones, for years. Some even say that the focus on immigrants as the main reason for the shortages misses deeper issues in homebuilding policy.

As noted in an analysis from VisaVerge.com, “Canada’s housing shortage will take years to resolve. Even after cutting migration, high prices will remain unless the country starts building more homes, and at a much faster rate.” The Royal Bank of Canada 🇨🇦 agrees, saying fewer newcomers will help, but not fix, the housing shortage.

Trade-Offs: Who Wins, Who Loses?

There are both potential upsides and serious risks from capping immigration. Supporters of Carney’s plan hope lower numbers will cool off the housing market, making it easier for everyone to find a place to live. Lower rents could help struggling renters. Homebuyers who were priced out might also finally get their chance.

But there are also tough trade-offs. Critics highlight several possible problems, including:

• Slower Labor Supply: Some key industries—especially construction and healthcare—already face worker shortages. Lower migration could make it even harder to find enough people to fill these jobs, unless the country quickly boosts training for Canadians 🇨🇦.
• More Temporary Residents in Limbo: If Canada 🇨🇦 suddenly makes big cuts, many low-wage workers and students already in the country might struggle to get legal status. Recent changes have left thousands unsure if they can stay. This uncertainty can be hard for the people involved, their families, and employers who depend on them.
• Pressure on Innovation and Growth: Businesses often say that newcomers drive new ideas and start companies. If migration is capped too tightly or too suddenly, some fear Canada 🇨🇦 could slow its economy in unexpected ways.

In short, capping immigration might bring quick relief to the housing market, especially in big cities. But if the country does not make major changes to how quickly new homes are built or how well newcomers’ skills are used, many core problems will remain.

Housing and Immigration: Beyond the Numbers

Canada’s housing crisis is about more than just how many people arrive each year. It is also about how and where homes get built, who gets to live there, and how cities plan for growth.

The government has started helping by opening new pathways for undocumented construction workers. For instance, this official page from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) gives more details about these changes—showing that immigration policy can also support homebuilding, not just create demand.

Yet gaps remain. Studies show only rapid, large-scale construction—especially of rental and affordable homes—will offer lasting relief. Many experts note that even with fewer newcomers, it could still take years before most Canadians 🇨🇦 see major changes in what homes cost.

Table: Carney’s Immigration Cap and Housing Plan—At a Glance

Arguments for and Against: Where Does the Debate Stand?

People who support Carney’s approach say that it gives Canada 🇨🇦 a much-needed chance to “catch up” on building homes and upgrading important services. They point to early signs, like falling rents in big cities, as proof that capping migration brings real relief.

On the other hand, critics argue that blaming immigrants for high home prices is short-sighted. They stress that many newcomers fill jobs Canadians 🇨🇦 do not, and that Canada’s economy actually depends on immigrants, especially as the population ages. They also warn that sudden caps can leave many people—workers, families, students—stranded without clear paths to stay or work.

As for housing, most agree the real problem is not just how many people immigrate, but how few homes are actually being built. This gap between ambitious population goals and weak home construction policy has led to the current squeeze.

The Broader Context: Why Canada 🇨🇦 Chose High Immigration

Canada’s long-standing approach to immigration has focused on economic growth and an aging population. It has brought in hundreds of thousands of newcomers each year for jobs, innovation, and to keep the population from shrinking. This policy has usually received broad support across political parties and the public.

But, as housing has become harder to find and prices have soared—especially since the COVID-19 pandemic—support has become shaky. When so many new people arrive and the number of homes stays nearly the same, prices naturally rise. Many young Canadians 🇨🇦 say they cannot afford to move out, buy their first home, or even find an apartment.

Carney’s proposal shows a move toward tying immigration more closely to what the country can actually provide—namely, homes and social services like healthcare. This rebalancing reflects the pressures Canadians 🇨🇦 feel right now.

Looking Ahead: What Might Happen Next?

Canada’s housing debate is not close to ending. If Carney becomes Prime Minister and tightens these policies, most experts say some short-term relief—lower rents, less crowded markets—will likely happen. But these effects may not last unless Canada 🇨🇦 builds far more homes and does so quickly.

There are also worries that capping immigration might backfire. Less migration could hurt key sectors or slow economic growth. And, as provinces and cities change their own rules, more people may end up in legal limbo.

Still, the move to align immigration with housing supply is now at the heart of Canadian 🇨🇦 policy. Most people—including policy experts and the general public—seem to agree that something must change. The real challenge is whether Canada 🇨🇦 can build enough safe, affordable homes fast enough to keep up with both current residents and future newcomers.

Closing Thoughts

Carney’s idea to cap immigration as a way to ease the housing crisis in Canada 🇨🇦 is now shaping both debate and policy. The basics of the plan are easy to understand: if fewer people arrive at once, there is less pressure on rents and home prices. Early signs suggest this is true for some big cities.

But the story does not end there. Real, lasting change depends on Canada’s ability to build many more homes—especially for middle- and low-income people. Experts agree: immigration policy alone will not cure the housing shortage. Instead, a mix of smart migration rules, quick homebuilding, and fair rules for current migrants is needed.

Anyone interested in supporting newcomers or finding a way into a Canadian 🇨🇦 home will want to watch what happens next. For now, as reported by VisaVerge.com, these new policies mark a turning point—but not the final answer. Future governments will need to fine-tune these plans, making sure that Canada 🇨🇦 remains both a welcoming country and a livable one for all.

Learn Today

Immigration Cap → A government-imposed limit on the number of newcomers allowed yearly, including permanent residents, students, and temporary workers.
Permanent Resident → A person granted the right to live and work in Canada indefinitely, without citizenship.
Non-Permanent Resident → Individuals in Canada on temporary status, such as international students or foreign workers, not permanent residents.
Pre-Pandemic Trends → Immigration or demographic patterns established before the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic (before 2020).
Housing Supply Gap → The difference between the number of homes needed and the number available, often resulting in shortages and higher prices.

This Article in a Nutshell

Canadian housing faces intense pressure as immigration surges. Mark Carney urges a cap, returning intake to sustainable pre-pandemic levels. While this may ease rental prices and strain on resources, experts caution only rapid new home construction can truly resolve the crisis. Immigration policy alone won’t solve Canada’s housing shortage.
— By VisaVerge.com

Read more:

• Express Entry: Canada invites 500 healthcare workers for residency
• Job market in Canada offers new paths for American professionals
• Canada keeps immigration caps while seeking more global talent
• How a Theft Under $5000 charge in Canada affects US Green Card hopes
• How to keep your U.S. green card while studying at a university in Canada