(PENNSYLVANIA) Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a longtime asylum seeker from El Salvador, has been moved by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to the Moshannon Valley Processing Center in central Pennsylvania after earlier confinement at the Farmville Detention Center in Virginia. The transfer followed his return to the United States in March 2025 after a wrongful deportation, according to his attorneys. They say the relocation places him hundreds of miles from previous counsel and community support, making regular meetings harder despite ICE assurances that the new site would improve access. As of September 28, 2025, he remains detained in Moshannon under continued legal review.
His attorneys in Nashville and New York City argue the move undermines attorney-client access, especially for in-person preparation that often drives asylum and protection claims. ICE has said transfers can increase access to counsel through telephones and video. Lawyers counter that remote calls are no substitute for private, timely meetings where documents can be reviewed and trust built. They also worry about delays receiving legal mail and scheduling visits at a large, privately run complex. The Moshannon Valley Processing Center is operated by The GEO Group, Inc., with capacity for up to 1,876 detainees, according to public records.

Background on Moshannon and Recent Concerns
Criticism of conditions at Moshannon predates the transfer. The facility reopened as an ICE site in 2021 and has faced repeated complaints from detainees and advocates about inhumane and dangerous conditions, including alleged assaults, inadequate medical care, and insufficient food.
- In August 2025, a detainee died by hanging inside the complex, drawing renewed scrutiny from local organizers and national watchdogs.
- Activists say reports of worsening conditions in 2025 have continued, even as the detained population has climbed.
- As of September 15, 2025, more than 1,400 people were held at Moshannon — the highest headcount so far this year.
Abrego Garcia’s Case History
Abrego Garcia fled El Salvador in 2011 after gang violence reached his family. In 2019, a U.S. immigration judge granted him protection from deportation, which should have shielded him from removal while his case moved forward. Yet in March 2025, he was wrongfully deported to El Salvador, a return that his legal team says exposed him to renewed danger.
After he made it back to the United States 🇺🇸, new allegations surfaced, including claims of gang affiliation and human smuggling. He denies those charges. His case has become a prominent test for current federal enforcement and detention policies.
Before the latest transfer, he was held at the Farmville Detention Center in Virginia, a site that for years has managed ICE detainees under contract. The move to Moshannon came after his return from the wrongful deportation, placing him in a different state and under a different private operator. His attorneys say they were not given a meaningful chance to object or prepare for the change. That, they argue, caused confusion about visits, document exchange, and court dates.
The defense team now coordinates across state lines, adding travel time and cost that can burden families and slow case work.
Transfer Raises Legal Access Concerns
ICE maintains that modern detention sites offer improved phone and video options for counsel, along with space for legal meetings. But defense lawyers stress that the right to meet freely and privately is more than a convenience; it is central to fair hearings.
They point to several practical barriers:
- Delays in setting up contact lists
- Rules limiting who may bring laptops or scanners
- Limited windows when staff can escort visitors
- Slowdowns moving legal mail through large facilities
In a case as complex as this one, attorneys say those hurdles can affect filings and preparation in a matter of days.
“Remote calls are no substitute for private, timely meetings where documents can be reviewed and trust built.” — Attorneys representing Abrego Garcia (paraphrased)
ICE publishes national detention standards that set rules for visitation, attorney calls, and legal materials. Advocates often cite these frameworks when raising complaints, noting gaps between policy and daily practice. For readers seeking the official reference, see the agency’s Performance-Based National Detention Standards on the ICE detention standards page. Lawyers for Abrego Garcia say that even with such standards on paper, access depends on staffing, scheduling, and the basic layout of the complex.
Moshannon: Size, Operator, and Daily Life
The Moshannon Valley Processing Center is one of the largest single ICE detention sites in the Northeast. Key facts:
- Operator: The GEO Group, Inc.
- Capacity: 1,876 detainees
- Reported population (Sept 15, 2025): >1,400 detainees
With room for thousands, the complex functions like a small town — housing units, medical areas, and multiple checkpoints. The GEO Group has said in past statements that it follows federal standards and provides medical and mental health services. Detainees and advocates, however, continue to describe:
- Crowded dorms
- Poor food
- Slow medical response
Attorneys say that in that setting, regular visits and confidential meetings require planning and constant follow-up that some families struggle to manage.
New Allegations and Defense Challenges
Authorities have raised claims of gang affiliation and human smuggling after his return. Abrego Garcia denies those accusations and maintains that he fled gang violence and sought refuge years ago.
Defense concerns include:
- Rebuilding trust and memory recall after transfer
- Re-establishing phone numbers and trusted service providers
- Reassembling a defense plan when files and witnesses are dispersed
Attorneys say contesting these allegations will take time, steady access, and conditions that allow a client to review records and share memories without fear. Transfers, they argue, interrupt that process.
Community Response and Advocacy
Community groups have rallied around the case. The Shut Down Detention Campaign called for demonstrations outside Moshannon in support of Abrego Garcia and others held there. Organizers plan to bring:
- Families
- Faith leaders
- Former detainees
Their demands are direct:
- Stop transfers that isolate people from counsel and support
- Improve medical care and mental health services
- Expand alternatives to detention and supervised release for people with strong legal claims
While protests do not decide cases, they can bring oversight and media attention that prompt reviews — especially after a death and mounting complaints about daily treatment.
Facility Conditions and Population Pressures
Population pressures have set the stage for many disputes. With more than 1,400 people detained on September 15, 2025, routine tasks slow down:
- Scheduling medical checks takes longer
- Law library and legal visit time is harder to secure
- Incoming phone lines may clog and wait times rise
Mental health care has been a central worry since the reported death by hanging in August 2025. Advocates say suicide risk should trigger:
- Stronger screening
- Swift referrals
- Close follow-up when people report distress
At large facilities, quiet warning signs are easier to miss. Detainees’ accounts since the death describe crowded housing and slow access to care. While conditions vary by unit, the recurring theme is stretched resources and lingering fear.
People held at Moshannon remain in civil custody, not criminal custody, while their immigration cases proceed. That posture still permits strict internal rules, but the purpose is supposed to be administrative, not punitive. Access to counsel is one of the few levers people have to seek release or win relief; attorneys insist that any transfer must be measured against that right.
Wider Policy and Community Impact
The case sits at the center of a national debate over government detention under current federal policies. Key tensions include:
- Supporters of private contracts argue companies can scale fast and manage costs.
- Critics argue profit motives can clash with care, staffing, and safety.
The Moshannon facility, run by a private operator, has become a touchpoint for that argument. Families in Pennsylvania and Virginia say the transfer from Farmville separated them from court watchers and church groups. They want placements closer to home or supervised release for people with strong community ties.
Due process in immigration court moves through hearings, filings, and sometimes appeals. Each step can take months. In that timeline, detention conditions and location can influence both strategy and morale.
As of September 28, 2025, Kilmar Abrego Garcia remains at Moshannon, where his attorneys continue to press for safe conditions and steady access while preparing to challenge the new allegations. Advocates say the outcome matters beyond one person; it will shape perceptions of large detention centers and transfers that pull clients away from support networks.
Practical Barriers: Rural Setting and Support Networks
Attorneys in Tennessee and New York highlight practical barriers posed by the rural setting:
- Limited public transport
- Long drives for family and counsel
- Lost volunteer and faith-based support networks
Phone calls help, but they cannot replace in-person meetings with case files spread out and an interpreter present. Counsel emphasize that:
- Building trust requires privacy and time
- Small delays can stop disclosure from clients who fled violence
- Transfers, intake procedures, and new rules force teams to start over just as momentum builds
Farmville and Moshannon differ in their local support networks. In Virginia, church groups and volunteers have long provided rides, clothing, and links to legal help. In central Pennsylvania, those networks exist but are thinner and take time to rebuild after a transfer. This matters in cases where witnesses must gather records or medical issues require outside follow-up.
Two Parallel Tracks of Advocacy
For now, legal and advocacy efforts run on two tracks:
- Case-specific: Contest the new allegations, preserve earlier protection, and press for conditions that permit private, steady work with counsel.
- Institutional: Target the Moshannon Valley Processing Center for safer medical care, stronger mental health support, and fewer transfers that sever ties to lawyers and family.
Both tracks contribute to a wider debate. Supporters of reform say change is overdue; defenders of the current model point to standards and audits. Upcoming hearings will test both claims.
For broader reporting on these issues, VisaVerge.com covers detention transfers, facility conditions, and the effect of distance on attorney access nationwide.
Current Status and Next Steps
- Status (as of Sept 28, 2025): Kilmar Abrego Garcia remains detained at Moshannon
- Legal priorities for his team:
- Challenge the new allegations (gang affiliation, human smuggling)
- Preserve his earlier protection from deportation
- Secure conditions that allow steady, private legal access
Advocates continue to press officials to review transfers like this one, improve medical staffing, and ensure private, timely legal visits — especially after the reported death in August 2025. Whether Abrego Garcia remains at Moshannon or is returned to Virginia, his case will serve as an indicator of how detention is used and how people inside are treated.
This Article in a Nutshell
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an El Salvadoran asylum seeker wrongfully deported in March 2025, returned to the U.S. and was transferred from Farmville Detention Center in Virginia to the Moshannon Valley Processing Center in central Pennsylvania. His attorneys, based in Nashville and New York, say the relocation—hundreds of miles away—impedes confidential, in-person meetings vital for asylum and defense preparation, despite ICE claims that phone and video access compensate. Moshannon, operated by The GEO Group with capacity for 1,876, has faced long-standing complaints about conditions, including a detainee death in August 2025 and a reported population above 1,400 on Sept 15, 2025. Ongoing concerns include delays in legal mail, restricted visit windows, and strained medical and mental health services. As of Sept 28, 2025, Abrego Garcia remains detained while attorneys contest new allegations and press for preserved protections and reliable legal access.