Key Takeaways
• Governor Polis resists deploying Colorado National Guard for federal immigration enforcement, citing risks to families and legal residents.
• Senate Bill 25-276 aims to restrict sharing immigration status and limit federal agent access to sensitive state locations.
• Polis collaborates with lawmakers to balance public safety while protecting immigrants’ privacy and limiting non-criminal deportations.
Governor Jared Polis has found himself at the center of a national conversation about immigration enforcement and state-federal cooperation. As the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently called for about 20,000 National Guard troops to help with immigration enforcement, the decision over whether to commit Colorado’s resources to this effort has brought fresh attention to the state’s own policies—and to Governor Polis’s careful, often cautious approach to immigration.
DHS Request: A Major National Move
Earlier this year, DHS officials asked all states to provide National Guard soldiers for use in immigration enforcement. This action is tied to President Trump’s broader immigration agenda, which puts pressure on federal and state agencies alike to focus resources on arrests and deportations, especially of people in the United States without proper papers who have been connected to criminal offenses.
The DHS request is large—the figure, around 20,000 troops, would represent a sizable force drawn from state Guards nationwide. The goal, according to DHS statements, is to “help carry out the President’s mandate from the American people to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens.” This request is not limited to border states but includes the entire country, suggesting a plan to increase enforcement in the interior, not just at the border.
Most governors have the power to decide if their state’s National Guard will take part, unless the President decides to “federalize” the Guard, which can override a governor’s wishes. This gives each state leader, including Gov. Polis, a key role in the debate.
Colorado’s Approach: Gov. Polis’s Careful Balance
Governor Polis has not hidden his concerns regarding using the National Guard for immigration enforcement in Colorado. His public statements and policy choices paint a picture of a leader trying to find a fair and practical approach, one that brings order without causing harm to families or workers who have called Colorado home for years.
At the start of this year, in his State of the State address, Gov. Polis was clear. He said that most immigration matters are civil—not criminal—and should stay in the hands of local law enforcement and federal agencies with proper training. As reported by VisaVerge.com, Polis pointed to the large, positive role immigrants play in the state’s economy, especially in farming and hospitality. He praised those “working in our communities for decades, whether it’s the critical agriculture sector or hospitality service sector.”
Polis’s views about immigration enforcement can be summed up with a few guiding ideas:
– He supports close work with federal agencies when it’s about arresting people who are in the United States illegally and also breaking the law. “If people are here illegally and committing crimes, we certainly want them apprehended,” he stated.
– At the same time, he stands against efforts that go too far, such as trying to deport people who already have legal status, break up families, or leave American children without parents. He does not want to see “efforts to deport American citizens, to target those on pending legal status, to break up families, to create orphans of American children whose parents are alive and who come to this country to build a better life for their families.”
These comments offer important clues to understanding why Gov. Polis has what some are calling “deep reservations” about using National Guard troops for immigration enforcement. He fears the risk that overly strong actions might cross a line, hurting longtime residents and families.
The State Legislature Steps In: Senate Bill 25-276
While the federal push for stronger immigration enforcement makes headlines, Colorado’s own legislature is moving in a different direction. Lawmakers are now discussing Senate Bill 25-276. This bill is about protecting undocumented immigrants—those without proper paperwork—by making it harder for police or other officials to share certain private details, including a person’s immigration status.
The central features of the bill include:
– Putting new limits on when someone’s immigration status can be disclosed to federal agents.
– Further restricting how much state and local law enforcement can work with federal officers on purely civil immigration matters.
– Tightening rules so that federal agents can’t easily access non-public spaces in places like hospitals, jails, or schools.
At first, Gov. Polis was not fully on board with the bill. He “expressed concerns,” saying he wanted to make sure any new law did not harm Colorado’s ability to keep its communities safe or step on federal authority in clear criminal cases. However, reports now show that Gov. Polis is “working with legislators” to tweak the bill, aiming for a result that respects both the privacy and dignity of immigrants and the proper roles of federal and state law enforcement.
Setting Colorado Apart
Governor Polis’s approach stands out when compared to those of some other state leaders who have been eager to send their National Guard to work with federal immigration agents, or who support tough, state-level crackdowns. In Colorado, there is far more focus on holding the middle ground—making sure serious criminals are not ignored, but also refusing to “target those on pending legal status” or break up families.
Colorado’s proposed law, Senate Bill 25-276, put forward by the state legislature, could set a new standard for how states treat the sharing of immigration status information and access to sensitive locations. If passed, it would make it much harder for federal agents to use local law enforcement as a gateway into immigrant communities, offering more privacy and peace of mind to people who might worry about being separated from their families for minor matters.
This approach is grounded in the idea that immigration status alone should not be treated like a criminal issue. Governor Polis has made clear that when immigrants contribute to the state through hard work and abiding by the law (outside of their civil immigration status), they deserve a chance to stay and thrive. His nuanced position is not always easy to explain but focuses on keeping families together, protecting children, and letting people who have built a life in Colorado continue to do so, unless there is a genuine public safety concern.
The Role of the National Guard: A Matter of Approval
The National Guard is a military reserve force controlled by each state’s governor unless the President calls them into federal service. Generally, they assist with big emergencies—floods, wildfires, or helping local law enforcement if something major happens.
Using the National Guard for immigration enforcement is both rare and very controversial. In past years, National Guard troops have sometimes been used along the border for support tasks (not direct law enforcement) to free up border agents. However, deploying them across the country—including Colorado—for broader immigration enforcement, such as making arrests or helping remove people, would be unusual.
According to legal experts, a governor’s approval is usually needed for such activity. If a governor disagrees, the President can “federalize” that state’s National Guard, which means taking control away from the governor. This is a serious step that can cause tension between state and federal leaders.
Gov. Polis’s well-documented caution signals he would refuse to send the Colorado National Guard if he believed their role would go beyond simply supporting urgent needs and into the territory of targeting families or non-criminal immigrants.
Broader Effects: What’s at Stake?
The choice about whether to use the National Guard for immigration enforcement has ripple effects across society.
For Immigrants
For immigrants living and working in Colorado—many of whom have been in the state for years—the possibility that the National Guard could be used for immigration enforcement brings new fears. Many worry about being stopped simply for not having papers, even though their day-to-day lives involve work, family, and community activities. They fear that the presence of troops in their neighborhoods could lead to more mistakes or unfair treatment.
Families are especially afraid of sudden separation. Children born in the United States 🇺🇸 could be separated from parents if large-scale enforcement removes longtime residents. This was a concern raised by Gov. Polis when he warned about “efforts…to create orphans of American children whose parents are alive.”
For Employers and the Economy
Colorado’s economy depends heavily on immigrant workers, especially in food production and hospitality. Employers in these areas rely on steady, reliable workers who may have lived in the United States 🇺🇸 for many years, even if they entered without legal papers long ago. Rapid, sweeping enforcement could take away these workers and damage whole industries.
Polis’s stress on “contributing to our economy” is a direct nod to farmers, restaurant owners, hoteliers, and many others who have built businesses around the state’s diverse workforce.
For Schools, Hospitals, and Public Safety
Senate Bill 25-276’s limits on the access federal agents have to schools and hospitals are not just about privacy. They also reflect worries that immigrant families might stay away from essential services—like taking children to school or going to the hospital—if they fear being caught up in an enforcement sweep.
Gov. Polis and many lawmakers believe that public safety is put at risk if people are too afraid to report crimes or seek medical help because of fears over immigration enforcement.
For State-Federal Relations
The standoff around DHS’s National Guard request and local bills like SB25-276 show a real push-and-pull between what states want for their residents and what the federal government wants for the country. Polis’s position—willing to cooperate on crime but not on broad, mass enforcement—may set Colorado apart from states that are either all-in or all-out on federal initiatives.
A Controversial Path Forward
Not everyone in Colorado agrees with Gov. Polis’s approach. Some lawmakers and citizens want to see tougher state efforts, arguing that strong enforcement is needed to stop illegal border crossings and protect resources.
Others believe the Governor’s balanced approach is the right one, focusing on compassion, economic well-being, and family unity. They point to studies showing that strong, diverse communities lead to a healthier, safer state.
Senate Bill 25-276, along with Gov. Polis’s careful reviewing of National Guard deployments, could become a model for other states wrestling with the same issues.
Potential Next Steps
At the legislative level, lawmakers continue to review the proposed bill and the specific amendments Gov. Polis is seeking. These may include language to allow more flexibility for law enforcement in serious criminal cases while still shielding families from wide, sweeping immigration enforcement.
At the federal level, the DHS request for National Guard troops remains a backdrop to these debates. If the White House chooses to federalize the Guard, it could force a direct showdown, but for now, the ball is largely in each governor’s court.
Understanding Your Rights and The Law
For immigrants, employers, and advocates in Colorado, it’s important to stay updated on these developments. You can learn more about the details of immigrant rights and what local laws allow by visiting the official Colorado General Assembly site. This source provides up-to-date bill progress and the exact text of measures under consideration.
Colorado’s response to the DHS request, Gov. Polis’s careful review of National Guard involvement, and new local protections will likely all play a role in shaping how immigration enforcement happens in the state—now and in the years ahead.
Summary
Governor Polis’s careful, balanced approach to immigration enforcement shows both caution about harsh nationwide actions and a commitment to keeping Colorado welcoming for longtime residents and families. While he supports removing dangerous criminals, he stands firmly against actions that would harm families or punish those simply trying to live and work. As the debate over the National Guard, DHS requests, and new state laws unfolds, all eyes will remain on how state leaders like Gov. Polis use their power and judgment to decide what’s right for Colorado.
For more information about current immigration policy in Colorado and to track Senate Bill 25-276, you can visit the Colorado General Assembly’s page on immigration policy.
With matters of immigration enforcement involving so many lives and choices, staying informed and engaged is key for everyone in Colorado.
Learn Today
National Guard → A state-controlled military reserve force, deployable by governors or federalized during emergencies or at presidential request for certain missions.
Senate Bill 25-276 → A proposed Colorado law to restrict sharing immigrants’ status, limit cooperation with federal agents, and protect sensitive locations from enforcement.
Federalize → A process in which the President assumes control of a state’s National Guard, overriding the governor’s authority.
Immigration Enforcement → Actions by authorities to locate, arrest, or remove individuals violating immigration laws, including through deportation and related operations.
DHS (Department of Homeland Security) → A federal agency overseeing immigration enforcement, border security, and national protection measures in the United States.
This Article in a Nutshell
Governor Jared Polis faces federal pressure to send Colorado’s National Guard for immigration enforcement. While he supports removing dangerous criminals, he’s cautious, fearing family separation and disruption. Senate Bill 25-276 seeks to protect immigrant privacy. Colorado’s careful approach may set an example, balancing security with compassion for longtime residents and their families.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Romanian nationals face immigration charges after U.S. Border Patrol stop
• Jacksonville International Airport parking garage fire leaves travelers stranded
• EVA Air adds transpacific flights to Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport
• Laos tops list of cheapest international travel destinations for 2025
• Jacksonville International Airport fire disrupts parking for months
