Key Takeaways
• Ohio’s CCNO jail began housing up to 96 ICE detainees in March 2025, expanding federal immigration enforcement locally.
• Butler County earned over $6.7 million in 2024 by renting jail beds to agencies including ICE, with hopes for $8.5 million in 2025.
• Advocates warn ICE contracts cause family separations, erode community trust, and sometimes lead to wrongful detentions of U.S. citizens.
Ohio jails have taken a larger role in the federal government’s immigration enforcement push, especially during the Trump administration. This has caused much debate and concern across the state. Many people wonder what this trend means for the communities, the detainees, and the local governments involved. The decision of several Ohio jails to house ICE detainees has created new questions about money, safety, and fairness in immigration policies. Let’s dive into what’s happening, why it matters, and what it could mean for the future.
Ohio Jails and the Growth of ICE Detention
In March 2025, a big change took place at the Corrections Center of Northwest Ohio (CCNO). The CCNO board approved a contract with ICE—short for Immigration and Customs Enforcement—that allowed the agency to use up to 96 beds in this large jail located in Williams County. It didn’t take long for this new plan to get underway. Within the very first week, 22 ICE detainees began living there. Most of these detainees did not come from Ohio, but were transported in from other states.
Before this agreement, only two other Ohio counties, Geauga and Seneca, had contracts with ICE to hold people detained while waiting for immigration hearings or deportations. The addition of the CCNO marked the third jail in Ohio to join this system. This change supports one of the Trump administration’s main goals: to increase immigration enforcement and work towards mass deportations, a promise made on the campaign trail.
But that’s not all. The role of Ohio jails in holding ICE detainees started to become a bigger issue as more people noticed the expanding involvement.
The Money Behind Holding ICE Detainees
Money is a big reason some local officials support having ICE detainees in Ohio jails. These agreements often bring in extra funds for counties, which local leaders find hard to say no to. Here’s a closer look at the financial side:
- The Corrections Center of Northwest Ohio gets paid $117 every day for each detainee, plus extra to cover travel and staffing costs related to moving detainees.
- In Butler County, 250 to 300 jail beds are set aside for ICE detainees, which comes out to about one-third of the county jail’s total space.
- In 2024, Butler County made over $6.7 million by renting jail beds to different government agencies—including ICE. Local officials hope to see this number rise to as much as $8.5 million in 2025.
Sheriff Thomas Kochert of Williams County put it simply. He said the move to hold ICE detainees at the CCNO was a “no brainer” for them because the jail has hosted federal prisoners of different types since the 1990s.
The money made this way helps offset jail operating costs and can make it easier for local leaders to balance their budgets. On paper, the finances sound like a win for these communities. But this only tells part of the story.
The Concerns from Advocates and Community Members
While the financial side of things looks helpful for some counties, many people in Ohio and across the country are worried about the human costs of these deals. Many immigration advocates and local residents believe that the price paid by detainees, their families, and the wider community is too high.
Main concerns from advocates include:
- Separation of families: Some agreements could separate parents from their children, sometimes even leaving U.S. citizen children without their main caretaker. In many cases, that has forced young kids into Child Protective Services even though relatives were available to help.
- Burden on local taxpayers: Although counties get paid by ICE, there are still hidden costs for local taxpayers. For example, they may need to pay for salaries, overtime, and other costs tied to extra work from local officers.
- Lack of legal requirement: The ACLU of Ohio has stressed that local sheriffs are not required by law to work with ICE or take part in these programs. These deals are choices, not mandates.
- Community trust: Some critics say that housing and working with ICE hurts the trust between police and the people they’re supposed to protect. If immigrants believe local police might help deport them, they may be less likely to report crimes or seek help.
The ACLU and other groups have made it clear that this expansion of ICE detention in Ohio is not required and could backfire in ways that make communities less safe and more fearful.
Real-Life Stories of Problematic Enforcement
Stories from Ohio and other states show that the way ICE detainees are held—or even wrongly detained—can have huge effects on people’s lives.
One example in February 2017 highlights what can go wrong. A Latin American family was driving through Ohio when they were stopped by the Ohio State Highway Patrol. A Border Patrol agent was also present. What happened next was alarming: both parents were detained even though their children were U.S. citizens. The children were temporarily placed in Child Protective Services before family members could get them. This raised questions about how and why families were being separated and whether alternatives were considered.
Another recent case came out of Florida. A U.S. citizen, Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez, was mistakenly detained by ICE for almost two days after a simple traffic stop. He was a U.S. citizen, but that fact did not stop his arrest and holding by immigration authorities. These stories, as reported by VisaVerge.com, show that the risk of wrongful detention is real and sometimes affects people who should never have been detained at all.
In April 2025, a federal judge openly accused the Trump administration of trying to hide the truth in another wrongful deportation case. The judge’s decision added pressure and public attention to claims that some enforcement actions were not being carried out fairly.
To get more details about these rules and current policies, you can always check out the official US Immigration and Customs Enforcement website, which explains how ICE works with local law enforcement and the rules for housing detainees.
The Trump Administration’s Policies and the Push for Mass Deportation
The Trump administration spent a lot of time and resources trying to make immigration enforcement tougher. One of the main ways this was done was by giving ICE more support—both money and space in local jails—to pick up and hold more immigrants and prepare them for deportation.
The approach was clear: put more pressure on undocumented immigrants, step up arrests, and process more cases for removal from the United States 🇺🇸. Many of the latest changes in Ohio—including the addition of new detention contracts in different counties—fit perfectly with that policy.
At the same time, some say the focus on numbers misses the bigger picture. There is concern these tactics could harm people who are longtime members of local communities, some with children who are born in the United States 🇺🇸, and many with no serious criminal background. Critics point out that mass deportation efforts risk catching innocent people in the system, which can have real social and emotional costs.
The Split Between Financial Gain and Human Cost
It’s clear there’s a big divide between local officials who see financial benefits and those who worry about the people being impacted. On one side, county sheriffs and government leaders can point to higher revenue, which helps pay jail staff and keep facilities open. With tight budgets, this money comes in handy and lets them avoid making cuts elsewhere.
But on the other side, there are community members, immigration advocates, and some local leaders who think the deals are the wrong fix for budget challenges. They say the money can’t make up for the damage caused when families are torn apart or when mistakes lead to U.S. citizens being wrongly locked up. Local groups also warn about the risk that immigrants will be scared to call the police if they are victims or witnesses to a crime, making communities less safe overall.
A Tense Relationship with ICE and the Future of Ohio Jails
Even though only a few jails in Ohio have these contracts now, the recent history shows that the number could change with new federal policies or political pressure. The Trump administration’s push led to more contracts and added beds, but there’s no guarantee what will happen if another administration takes power or changes course.
Counties face a tough choice. Accepting deals with ICE can bring millions of dollars in new revenue while also drawing sharp criticism from within the community. Officials must weigh the short-term gain in funds and extra jobs against the longer-term effects on the people who live and work in these areas.
Local leaders are being asked to look at more than just the checkbook. They’re being told to think about how these contracts affect trust in public institutions, the safety and stability of families, and the picture of justice and fairness across Ohio. This debate is far from over and is likely to get even louder as new immigration proposals come up around election years.
Key Takeaways for Ohio Communities
- Financial pressure on jails: Agreements with ICE bring new money, but come with responsibilities and extra costs for counties and taxpayers.
- Community impact: Increased ICE detention can mean more family separations, mistrust between police and the public, and mistakes like the detention of U.S. citizens.
- Ongoing debate: The role of Ohio jails in federal immigration enforcement reflects bigger national arguments about who pays for immigration enforcement, who profits, and who bears the risks.
As more counties consider signing new ICE detention contracts or renewing old ones, everyone involved—officials, families, and voters—should pay close attention to how these decisions are made and what they mean for the lives of Ohioans and newcomers alike.
For those who want more information or to understand the official position and guidelines, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement page has detailed facts about detention, enforcement, and how agencies work together.
The situation with Ohio jails and ICE detainees is a reminder of the hard questions facing communities during the Trump administration. Choices made today will shape the future of immigration in Ohio for years to come.
Learn Today
ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) → A federal agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws and managing the detention and removal of undocumented immigrants.
Detention Contract → An agreement between local jails and federal agencies to house detainees awaiting immigration hearings or deportations.
ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) → An organization advocating for civil liberties, often opposing local cooperation with ICE on human rights grounds.
Deportation → The formal removal of a non-citizen from the United States due to violation of immigration laws.
Child Protective Services → A government agency that temporarily cares for children whose parents are detained or separated due to immigration enforcement.
This Article in a Nutshell
Ohio jails’ participation in ICE detention has grown, driven by both financial gains and federal pressure under the Trump administration. While some counties benefit from increased revenue, advocates highlight serious human costs, including family separations and improper detentions. This debate raises critical questions about justice, safety, and the future of immigration policies.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Florida Forces Full ICE Cooperation in Every County
• Justice Department Claims Pam Bondi Can Revoke Green Cards
• Joe Exotic’s Husband Deported After ICE Detention
• Oregon Moves to Block ICE at Courthouses
• ICE Floods Charlotte, Refuses to Reveal Operations
