Key Takeaways
• Twenty airlines demand changes to Israel’s passenger compensation laws before resuming flights, citing major financial risks during emergencies.
• Key demands include capping accommodations, reducing notification periods, and government-backed insurance for international carriers serving Israel.
• Major airlines like Air Canada postponed Israel flights through at least September 2025 unless Israel amends its aviation laws.
A coalition of 20 international airlines has formally called on Israel 🇮🇱 to make urgent legal reforms before they will consider resuming regular Israel flights. The airlines have outlined several clear demands, focusing mainly on changing laws related to passenger compensation and adjusting rules for what carriers must provide travelers if flights are canceled or delayed due to security emergencies. These requests come as most international airlines have cut or suspended service to Israel 🇮🇱, following ongoing security concerns, including a recent missile strike near Ben Gurion Airport.
This situation marks a turning point for air travel to and from Israel 🇮🇱. For months, Israel 🇮🇱’s air connections to the rest of the world have been limited, with only a handful of non-Western airlines—such as FlyDubai and Etihad Airways—maintaining uninterrupted service. The European and North American presence remains extremely limited, with airlines like Air Canada postponing any resumption of Israel flights until at least September 2025.

As reported by VisaVerge.com, foreign airlines believe the current legal system in Israel 🇮🇱 imposes unfair financial risks on them during ongoing emergencies. The carriers’ demands remain at the center of ongoing talks with the Israeli government.
Key Demands from the Airlines
The international airlines have presented a list of core demands aimed at changing the Israeli legal framework governing air travel during emergencies. These include:
- Temporary Suspension or Modification of Compensation Laws: Airlines want Israel 🇮🇱’s Transportation Ministry to declare a formal “special security situation.” This declaration would temporarily limit the airlines’ responsibility under the 2012 Aviation Services Law. Under the current law, airlines must provide substantial compensation to passengers for cancellations or long delays, regardless of whether these are caused by war or attacks. The airlines argue this is not sustainable when emergency situations, like the recent war, keep flights grounded for weeks or months.
-
Shorter Notification Periods for Changes and Cancellations: At present, the law requires airlines to give at least 14 days’ notice to passengers for flight changes or cancellations to avoid paying compensation. The airlines want this cut down to three days during security emergencies. They say such flexibility is needed when things are changing rapidly due to security risks at airports.
-
Limited Accommodation Obligations: Airlines currently must pay for hotel stays and other accommodation for travelers stranded due to cancellations. The new demand is to cap this obligation at two nights per passenger during emergencies. This would limit the airlines’ expenses and risks during lengthy disruptions.
-
Exemption from Extra Financial Compensation: For flights scheduled from May 5, 2025 and through the end of any declared emergency, airlines are asking to be exempt from being forced to pay compensation beyond ticket refunds. This means airlines would not have to cover extra cash payments to passengers despite war-related disruptions.
-
Government Support for Insurance: Foreign carriers are seeking the same government help for insurance as given to domestic Israeli airlines. Insurance has become harder and more expensive to obtain due to increased risks. Without government backing, many carriers say it simply isn’t practical to keep running Israel flights.
These five demands represent the core of the international airlines’ requests. The goal is to reduce exposure to sudden financial losses linked to unpredictable security events while still allowing travelers some measure of protection.
Rationale: Why the Demands?
The main argument from the airlines is that the existing compensation rules were created during times of relative calm. With the added risks of conflict, including potential missile attacks, carriers fear they will suffer huge financial losses if forced to follow the same rules in unsafe conditions.
Since October 2023, most foreign airlines have suspended flights to Israel 🇮🇱 after missile attacks in the region and growing instability. During this time, if the current law remains in place, the risk is twofold: not only financial losses from having empty or canceled flights, but also the chance of facing class-action lawsuits from passengers under the 2012 Aviation Services Law. The combination means airlines could be forced to pay millions of dollars in compensation, even though the disruptions are outside their control.
This risk is driving a firm stance by international airlines. As Shirly Kazir, an airline representative, said, “The conditions are ripe…to instate mechanisms applicable for emergency situations.” The group further states that unless the legal system is updated to match the current reality, airlines may not resume flights for many months or even years.
Flight Suspensions: The Current Situation
At present, the major European and North American airlines are not flying to Israel 🇮🇱. The main exception is a few airlines based in the Middle East and Asia, such as FlyDubai and Etihad Airways, which continue normal operations. For most international carriers, however, the earliest they might return is late May or June 2025, with some (like Air Canada) extending suspension until September, mainly due to safety concerns after the attacks near Tel Aviv. According to sources, unless the requested legal reforms occur, these suspensions will likely continue.
This has left Israel 🇮🇱 more isolated, making it harder for families, businesspeople, and tourists to travel in and out of the country. This lack of Israel flights puts extra strain on the few remaining carriers and adds to the sense of isolation for Israel 🇮🇱’s residents.
How the Israeli Government Has Responded
Israel’s Transportation Ministry has publicly acknowledged the need for talks and promised to work with foreign airlines on new safety and compensation rules. Officials state they are “working diligently” to develop updated protocols and review the legal frameworks that affect international airlines. The ministry’s aim is to create rules that both restore confidence among foreign carriers and protect passengers impacted by war-related disruptions. Despite these statements, as of now, there is no final agreement in place, and discussions are continuing.
What the Airlines Want Changed: A Closer Look
Below is a simple comparison of the airlines’ demands versus the current rules in Israel 🇮🇱:
Airline Demand | Current Israeli Law |
---|---|
Limit passenger compensation during emergencies | Airlines must pay full compensation even during crises (including wars) |
Notice period for schedule changes: 3 days | 14-day minimum advance notice required |
Accommodation capped at two nights | Broader, unlimited accommodation responsibilities |
No extra cash penalties during emergencies | Must pay monetary penalties as well as refunds |
Government assistance with insurance | Little or no government support to insulate risk |
This table shows the stark difference between what airlines want and what the law currently demands.
Comparing the Situation Before and After the Proposed Changes
Before these demands, Israel 🇮🇱 applied strict compensation rules to all airlines, including during times of war or emergency. These laws treat canceled or delayed flights—no matter the cause—as something the airline must fully cover, including hotel stays, meal vouchers, cash penalties, and more. The 2012 Aviation Services Law in particular forces airlines to pay compensation for circumstances often out of their control.
If Israel 🇮🇱 agrees to the proposed changes, airlines would have exceptions written into the law for declared emergencies. They would have fewer costs, reduced obligations to passengers, and better access to insurance thanks to government guarantees.
The biggest implication: Many international airlines say they will only return flights to Israel 🇮🇱 if these reforms are made. For passengers, the trade-off could mean less compensation during emergencies, but more flights available overall, bringing greater access in times of uncertainty.
Potential Impacts on Different Groups
- Passengers: Travelers may have less access to cash compensation and shorter hotel stays if their flights get canceled due to war or emergency. However, if fewer legal hurdles exist, there’s a better chance that more airlines will resume service to Israel 🇮🇱, making travel possible when it otherwise would not be.
-
International Airlines: Carriers get protection from large payouts during emergencies. This protection would likely convince more airlines to renew their operations, which have been on hold for many months.
-
The Israeli Government and Economy: More international airlines returning would bring in much-needed travel and tourism business. However, the government must balance this with defending consumer rights and the interests of Israeli 🇮🇱 passengers.
Official Quotes and Perspectives
Shirly Kazir, who represents several European and North American airlines, has stressed that unless the Israeli government offers more flexibility for airlines, international flights might not resume for a long time. She said, “More flexibility is essential if foreign carriers are expected to resume service soon rather than months—or years—later.”
Government officials have countered that their goal is to update the rules responsibly and ensure that travelers are not left without help during emergencies.
Timelines and Process
The push for legal reforms started after foreign airlines halted almost all Israel flights following the October 2023 attacks. Since then, major airline associations and legal teams have met repeatedly with Israel’s Transportation Ministry. The government has yet to announce any specific timeline for when—or if—changes will take effect.
Any new law or policy will need to pass through the Israeli parliament (the Knesset) and face public debate. There may also be legal challenges from consumer advocates who worry that passenger rights could be undermined if compensation laws become too weak.
Implementing the New Measures
If Israel 🇮🇱 decides to pass temporary legal reforms, the airlines propose these remain in place only during officially declared emergencies. A formal government announcement would trigger these rules, with previous compensation measures returning once peace resumes.
During the transition, both airlines and the government would need to communicate changes clearly to travelers. The Transportation Ministry said they want to design “user-friendly” explanations to avoid confusion.
For passengers with existing tickets, airlines propose applying new rules only to future bookings and pending claims from after the official change date. This is meant to avoid legal disputes about retroactive compensation.
Possible Controversies and Debates
Some observers disagree with the airlines’ demands, noting that passengers can be left vulnerable if compensation promises are reduced too greatly. Consumer groups have stated that international airlines should share some of the burden during crises, especially when flights are canceled on short notice.
On the other hand, industry voices argue that if risks and costs are too high, airlines will simply choose not to fly to Israel 🇮🇱 — leaving travelers stranded with no flight options at all.
As quoted by sources, the real debate is over how much risk should fall on airlines versus passengers during unpredictable, dangerous events.
Legal Questions and Pending Issues
No lawsuits or court challenges have yet been filed, but experts warn these may arise if travelers feel their rights are harmed. There is also the possibility that any new law could be contested in the Israeli court system by either airline groups or consumer protection agencies.
Advice for Compliance and Next Steps
For now, all parties should monitor government updates and be ready to adjust to new requirements. Travelers considering Israel flights should review tickets and refund policies carefully. Airlines must keep close communication with customers and prepare for rapid shifts in compensation rules.
For ongoing official developments, the Israel 🇮🇱 Ministry of Transport and Road Safety provides the latest legal documents and announcements here.
Anyone directly affected—either as a passenger or a business—should speak to a qualified legal adviser about specific cases, since regulations may change quickly and have lasting impacts.
Summary
To sum up, 20 international airlines are demanding legal reforms to Israel 🇮🇱’s air travel laws. Their main requests involve limiting compensation rules, shortening notification periods for changes, capping obligations for accommodation, ending extra payouts during emergencies, and receiving state support for insurance. With most Israel flights currently suspended, the airlines argue that only legal relief will make it possible for them to return. Discussions with the Israeli government are ongoing, and the next steps depend on whether a legal compromise can be reached that balances the interests of airlines, passengers, and the state.
Always check with official sources and professional advisers for the most current rules and your rights regarding Israel flights and compensation.
This report integrates official statements, legal analysis, and the latest developments as tracked by VisaVerge.com. For more details, see the Israel Ministry of Transport and Road Safety.
Learn Today
Aviation Services Law → An Israeli law from 2012 requiring airlines to compensate passengers for cancellations, delays—including those caused by emergencies or war.
Passenger Compensation → Monetary or service benefits airlines must provide travelers for disrupted flights, sometimes including hotel stays and cash payments.
Special Security Situation → A formal declaration by Israel’s government recognizing heightened risk, triggering temporary changes to aviation rules and compensation.
Class-Action Lawsuit → A legal action where a group of people sue together over similar grievances, such as flight disruption compensation.
Government-Backed Insurance → Insurance policies supported or guaranteed by the government, protecting carriers from excessive risks during conflict or emergencies.
This Article in a Nutshell
International airlines refuse to resume Israel flights unless legal reforms limit their emergency compensation obligations. Carriers seek capped accommodation, reduced advance notices, and state-supported insurance. The Israeli government is negotiating, but no deal is final. Passengers may face reduced payouts if reforms pass, but more airline options could return.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Air Canada delays Israel flights until September 8, 2025
• Betar US Targets Anti-Israel Students for Deportation
• Lufthansa Group extends flight suspensions to Israel through May 2025
• Dual citizenship not a factor in Israel hostage rescue, says Isaac Herzog
• Flights to Israel Halted After Missile Hits Airport