Key Takeaways
• $5 million gold visa proposed to fast-track wealthy applicants’ U.S. citizenship within two weeks.
• Major fee increases: asylum applications could cost $1,000; unaccompanied minors’ cases $3,500; work permits $550.
• Birthright citizenship faces Supreme Court challenge; denaturalization efforts intensify for existing naturalized Americans.
The United States 🇺🇸 has always been known as a country that welcomes people from around the world, offering hope and a fresh start. However, under possible second-term changes led by President Trump, the way people become U.S. citizens may look very different. Many new policy ideas on the table could change who gets U.S. citizenship, how much it costs, and whether being born in the country still guarantees all the rights people have come to expect.
Introducing the $5 Million Gold Visa
One major change in focus is the idea of a “$5 million gold visa.” This plan would let very rich foreigners buy a fast-track to U.S. citizenship. Instead of waiting many years, people with $5 million could get through the process in as little as two weeks. This would be a huge shift from past rules, which do not let people skip ahead just because they have more money.
In the past, most people who became U.S. citizens did so by showing that they wanted to be part of the country, that they could work, that they passed background checks, and that they were willing to go through the normal waiting times. The new gold visa plan, if it becomes law, would be very different. As reported by VisaVerge.com, it could move the United States toward a system where wealthy people are given special paths to citizenship—and everyone else faces tougher rules and higher costs.
Critics point out that this new path only applies to a small number of people. Most would still need to follow the usual, longer and harder process, and now might need to pay even more.
Rising Fees for Most Immigrants
While the $5 million gold visa would help the wealthiest immigrants, fees for everyone else would go up sharply under proposed rules. Some of the increases include:
– Children arriving alone, known as “unaccompanied minors,” would pay $3,500 just to process their case.
– Immigrants seeking work permits would pay $550.
– People applying for asylum, who used to pay no fee at all, would now be charged $1,000.
For many families, these higher fees could make it very hard to apply for protection or to seek better opportunities. Children and families fleeing danger would need to gather huge amounts of money just to get a chance at safety. Most immigration experts believe these costs are the highest the United States has ever suggested for these groups.
People who support these changes say the United States needs to save money and stop people from making false claims for asylum or work. Those against the increases say the new fees could deny help to those who need it most and would be unfair to people with little or no money.
To see the current fees for different immigration benefits and forms, you can visit the official government website for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Challenge to Birthright Citizenship
For more than 150 years, the U.S. Constitution has been understood to guarantee citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, no matter their parents’ legal status. This is called “birthright citizenship.” It comes from the 14th Amendment, written after the Civil War, to make sure all people born in the country have the same rights.
Under President Trump’s new plan, this could soon change. The new idea is to say that babies born in the country to certain groups—including undocumented immigrants and people visiting on student or work visas—would no longer get U.S. citizenship by birth. This has caused a big debate across the United States.
Right now, there are about 2 million people in the United States on temporary visas, such as students or workers. Under the proposed rules, a child born to these parents in the United States would not automatically get citizenship. The same goes for the children of those living in the country without documents. If these changes take effect, many children could be born and raised in the United States but have no right to citizenship.
The issue is now at the Supreme Court. Some justices have pointed out that if birthright citizenship is changed, different states might create their own rules about who is a citizen. This could mean a child would be a citizen in one state but not in another—a situation that judges said is “not workable” and would cause many problems. The decision on this case could affect many families and even how states treat children born inside their borders.
The New Focus on Denaturalization
Becoming a U.S. citizen has always been seen as a permanent step—a promise that the country makes to new citizens. However, new measures now put this idea up for debate. In February, the Department of Justice created a new “Denaturalization Section.” This group’s main job is to look for cases where they believe someone should lose their U.S. citizenship, even many years after they became a citizen.
Earlier, during President Trump’s first term, more than 700,000 naturalized citizens were reviewed for possible mistakes or rules broken during their naturalization process. Now, former advisor Stephen Miller says these efforts will be “turbocharged,” meaning the government will step up its search for people to strip of their citizenship.
There is no time limit for how far back the government can look (“no statute of limitations”). This has created a sense of worry for many of the 24 million people who became U.S. citizens by going through the proper steps over the past decades.
Immigrant rights groups, lawyers, and some members of Congress say that taking away citizenship long after it’s given could harm families and communities. They warn that it might make millions of naturalized citizens feel unsafe and unsure of their place in American society. The question is whether a process that is supposed to bring people into the country as full members can stay meaningful if it can be taken away at any time.
What These Changes Mean for American Values
The United States has long shown itself as open to all—welcoming poor and rich, skilled and unskilled, refugees and business leaders. The idea was simple: people could come, work hard, and become Americans if they followed the rules and were willing to try. This was seen as a core part of the country’s strength.
Today’s proposals mark a big change. The “$5 million gold visa” brings in a rule that rich people should get the best, fastest treatment, while the poor must pay higher fees and face more blocks. This means U.S. citizenship could become something only the wealthy can hope for, while everyone else has a much harder time reaching it.
People against these changes say that America risks losing the drive, courage, and creative ideas that have always come from immigrants with few resources. Most research since the 1800s shows that new immigrants—regardless of money—have been hard workers and have brought many positive changes to society.
There are also questions about the safety risks of letting rich people into the country so quickly. For example, when President Trump was asked if Russian oligarchs—very rich people with ties to powerful networks—could use the gold visa, he replied, “Possibly.” He even added, “Hey, I know some Russian oligarchs that are nice people.” This answer did not settle concerns about fast-tracking people who could pose risks if security checks are rushed.
Potential Impacts on Dissent and Free Speech
Another concern is that new rules could be used to target people who speak out against the government or express views that are unpopular. For example, after President Trump’s decisions related to Gaza, Turkish student Rumeysa Ozturk was arrested for speaking out. In another case, Mohsen Mahdawi was detained during his citizenship interview because of political opinions. These examples make some people worry that the government might use its new powers to target dissenters or those who disagree with policy choices.
Critics say that part of what makes the United States special is its protection of free speech and the right to challenge leaders. If people worry they could lose their citizenship or face arrest for their views, this would be a step away from the country’s ideals.
Long-Term and Immediate Effects
If these changes move forward, the immediate effect would be fewer people gaining U.S. citizenship through normal paths, and more people paying higher fees or being denied protection and jobs. Many families could be split apart or left in limbo, especially if birthright citizenship is overturned. People could be born in the United States 🇺🇸 and have no home country or citizenship anywhere.
Employers may have trouble finding workers, especially in fields like technology and health care, where many rely on immigrants. Colleges could see fewer international students if staying in the country becomes too risky or expensive.
Lawyers, community groups, and even some business leaders say that making U.S. citizenship harder to get or easier to take away could turn back two centuries of welcoming new talent and ideas. They believe the changes may not just affect immigrants, but the entire U.S. economy and culture.
Differing Views
Supporters of the new policies argue the United States needs to protect its borders and prevent people from taking advantage of its immigration system. They worry about security, the costs of providing social services, and whether current policies are fair.
Those opposed say that higher fees, ending birthright citizenship, and easier denaturalization go against American traditions. They warn of lasting harm to the nation’s image and to the millions who see the United States as a place of hope.
What Comes Next?
All of these proposed changes—from the $5 million gold visa to the new rules about birthright citizenship and denaturalization—are part of a wider debate over the future of the United States as a home for newcomers. Key cases are moving through the courts. The Supreme Court’s decision about birthright citizenship will likely become one of the biggest legal battles in the coming year.
People interested in the latest updates on these changes can turn to official government sources, such as the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) website, for news on policies and application procedures.
Closing Thoughts
The future of U.S. citizenship—and what it means to be an American—is being questioned as never before. The possible rise of the $5 million gold visa, the challenge to birthright citizenship, and tougher denaturalization rules, together could create a system centered on money, fear, and uncertainty. For many watching around the world, these choices will show what kind of country the United States wants to be in the coming years. Whether it remains a beacon open to all, or a fortress open mainly to those who are wealthy or connected, is a question that affects millions and is now at the heart of the national debate.
Learn Today
Birthright Citizenship → The automatic right to citizenship for anyone born on U.S. soil, regardless of their parents’ immigration status, under the 14th Amendment.
Denaturalization → Legal process whereby an individual’s U.S. citizenship, previously granted, is revoked due to legal violations or fraud.
Asylum → Protection granted by a nation to someone fleeing persecution or danger in their home country; applicants seek legal safety in another country.
$5 Million Gold Visa → A proposed plan allowing wealthy foreigners to buy expedited U.S. citizenship processing by investing $5 million, bypassing traditional requirements.
Unaccompanied Minor → A child under 18 entering the U.S. without a parent or legal guardian, especially in immigration or asylum proceedings.
This Article in a Nutshell
America’s immigration system may shift dramatically under proposed policies favoring the wealthy. The $5 million gold visa enables rapid citizenship, while higher fees challenge poor immigrants. Potential removal of birthright citizenship and easier denaturalization could reshape who qualifies as an American, intensifying debates about fairness, opportunity, and U.S. values.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Spain ends golden visa for real estate investors from April 2025
• Kazakhstan’s Golden Visa Program launches to attract global investors
• UAE expands Golden Visa opportunities to more professionals, including nurses
• Golden Visa brings €1.2 billion to Portugal’s Porto and other cities
• Portugal Golden Visa raises investment threshold for 2025 applications
