Key Takeaways
• Rejaz Sydeek was arrested in Nagpur on May 7, 2025, under UAPA and multiple BNS sections.
• Police allege Sydeek has Maoist links, spread propaganda, and communicated with ISI operatives through social media.
• Court extended Sydeek’s police custody to May 18, 2025; his girlfriend Isha Kumari was also detained.
Rejaz Sydeek, a 26-year-old activist from Kerala, found himself at the center of a national debate after he was arrested in Nagpur and charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). This act is often used in India when a person is suspected to have links with terrorism or groups considered unlawful by the government. The case of Rejaz Sydeek has raised many questions about the rights of activists and journalists, the scope of anti-terror laws in India, and how law enforcement agencies handle such cases.
Who Is Rejaz Sydeek?
Rejaz Sydeek is well known among student circles in Kerala. He has been active in raising his voice for the rights of students and other marginalized groups. He describes himself as an independent journalist, having written articles for platforms like Maktoob Media and The Observer Post. Often, his work focused on topics such as caste discrimination, communal violence, and social justice. Reports say he belongs to the Democratic Students Association (DSA), which some officials have linked to the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).
The Arrest in Nagpur
On May 7, 2025, police in Nagpur arrested Rejaz Sydeek along with his girlfriend, Isha Kumari, who is a 22-year-old student from Nagpur. Police picked them up from a hotel, saying that they had received information about anti-national activities. The arrest did not happen in Kerala, Sydeek’s home state, but in Nagpur, a city that has seen tensions and security alerts in the past. As reported by VisaVerge.com, such interstate actions often require coordination between different state police and other specialized agencies.
At first, officials charged Sydeek under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which is India’s main criminal code. These included:
– Section 149: preparing to wage war against the government of India
– Section 192: giving provocation with intent to cause riot
– Section 351: criminal intimidation
– Section 353: statements conducing to public mischief
These are serious charges, but what made the case even more urgent was the later addition of the UAPA, known for its strict standards and penalties.
Extension of Police Custody
A court in Nagpur decided to extend Rejaz Sydeek’s police custody until May 18, 2025. This means the police have more time to question him and collect evidence. Whenever the UAPA is invoked, the accused can be kept in custody for a longer time, and getting bail becomes much harder.
Key Allegations: What Are the Police Saying?
The police have accused Sydeek of several acts they consider very dangerous:
– Links to the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist). This organization is considered a threat to country’s security by the Indian government.
– Helping spread the Maoist agenda by organizing propaganda, raising money, and creating student support networks across various states.
– Alleged contact with Pakistan-based Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) operatives. The ISI is the main intelligence agency in Pakistan and is often seen by Indian officials as a source of trouble.
– Sharing social media posts critical of Operation Sindoor, which was a military action by India, as well as anti-Naxal operations aimed at Maoist groups.
– Posting on Instagram with content showing him posing with firearms and condemning the Indian Army.
Police say that these actions fit a larger pattern of trying to disrupt order and spread dangerous ideas. They also mention that during a search at Sydeek’s home in Ernakulam, they found electronic devices, books, and documents they believe are related to his alleged illegal activities.
Investigation Changes Hands
At first, state authorities in Kerala were handling the matter. However, after the UAPA charges and more serious allegations, the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) took over. This move shows that the case is being treated as a high priority and that the officials believe it might have connections outside just one state. Nagpur has come into focus because of this case, highlighting the city’s role in security operations in the region.
The raid on Sydeek’s home led to confiscation of electronic gadgets and paperwork. Police also say they found books about GN Saibaba, who is a noted thinker with Maoist views, and other material they describe as pro-Maoist.
The Role of Isha Kumari
Isha Kumari, the girlfriend of Rejaz Sydeek, was also arrested during the operation in Nagpur. At this point, it is not clear what specific charges, if any, have been brought against her. Authorities have not explained whether she was involved in any of the alleged activities or was simply present at the hotel with Sydeek.
Previous Legal Issues
This is not the first time Sydeek has had problems with the law. On April 29, 2025, Kerala Police filed a first information report (FIR) against him and seven others. The case related to their involvement in a protest against what they called the “collective punishment of Kashmiris following the Pahalgam attack.” Such protests are not unusual within student groups that focus on rights and political issues, but they often draw attention from the authorities, especially in times of security concerns.
Statements from Human Rights Activists
The reaction to Sydeek’s arrest has been strong. Many human rights activists say that charging him under UAPA is unfair. Some have called it “another example of an undeclared emergency,” pointing out that the authorities might be using harsh anti-terrorism laws to stop political activism or reporting that the government finds uncomfortable.
Supporters say Sydeek’s work as a journalist and student organizer makes him a target. They believe criticizing the government or its military operations should not be treated as a crime. Critics, however, argue that if there is proof Sydeek was involved in anti-national or violent acts, then legal action is necessary.
Larger Impacts and Legal Concerns
The UAPA has faced criticism in India and abroad because it gives police broad powers and makes it very difficult for the accused to get bail. It also allows the government to clamp down on organizations it considers dangerous with little need for public explanation. This means that journalists and activists like Sydeek can spend months or even years in jail waiting for their cases to be heard in court.
Groups who follow the use of such laws worry that the police sometimes use them to silence people who simply have strong opinions or challenge the government. On the other hand, supporters believe these laws are important to keep the country safe from serious threats.
The situation becomes even more complicated when the investigation suggests links between activism, political groups, and international networks. Claims of Sydeek communicating with ISI operatives, spreading banned ideology, or mobilizing students for unlawful activities touch on deep fears and sensitivities within the country.
The Debate Over Social Media and Online Expression
One of the points of discussion in this case has been Sydeek’s social media posts. The police claim that he posted on Instagram, holding firearms and criticizing army operations. In today’s world, what people write or share online can quickly become a matter of police action, especially if the topic is sensitive. Some say that social media can easily be misunderstood, while others argue that it is being used to promote dangerous ideas. For more details on India’s official procedures and rules around these issues, you can visit the Ministry of Home Affairs’ official website.
Student Movements and State Response
The Nagpur case involving Rejaz Sydeek is not the first time a student activist has been charged under tough laws in India. Across the country, students are often at the front line of protests. They challenge laws, government actions, and social policies.
Organizations like the Democratic Students Association, which Sydeek belonged to, have been watched closely by authorities. Many students believe this attention is meant to scare them away from political activity. Meanwhile, officials say that when student groups are used as fronts by banned organizations like CPI (Maoist), action is necessary.
The events in Nagpur raise questions about student activism in a democracy like India. Is it safe for students to express their ideas? Where is the line between genuine debate and illegal action? These are questions many are now asking after the arrest.
The Complexity of Legal Processes
Cases under UAPA often last a long time. The law provides a wide reach to investigative agencies. At the same time, courts are supposed to keep a check on any misuse.
For the common person, it can be confusing to follow these developments. Terms like “Urban Maoist,” “anti-national activity,” and “propaganda” have deep legal meanings. But for those charged, the main reality is the long, difficult road through police investigations, court hearings, and public debate.
The Importance of Transparency and Law
With such serious allegations, it becomes important that the case proceeds openly and fairly. Sydeek and others charged under UAPA should have a fair chance to defend themselves. Evidence collected from the Nagpur hotel, social media accounts, and raids in Ernakulam must stand up to close review by the courts.
At the same time, the police and agencies like the Maharashtra ATS need to show that their actions are guided by facts and law—not just by suspicion or the wish to make an example.
Final Thoughts
The arrest of Rejaz Sydeek in Nagpur under the UAPA highlights a tense moment for India’s democracy. On one hand, the country faces security threats that worry ordinary people. On the other, there is the danger that powerful tools like the UAPA can be used against those who speak up or work as journalists.
Families, students, and activists are closely watching what happens to Sydeek and Isha Kumari. They are not only worried about justice in one case. They are also asking what the future holds for dissent, debate, and reporting in India.
As this case moves forward, it will test the country’s ability to balance security and freedom. Whatever the court finds, the story of Rejaz Sydeek will remain a key example for anyone interested in student movements, human rights, and the rule of law in India. For ongoing updates and more stories on cases like this, VisaVerge.com promises to keep readers informed with factual reporting and analysis.
Learn Today
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) → A strict Indian law allowing detention and prosecution for suspected terrorism or unlawful activities targeting national security.
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) → India’s new main criminal code, replacing the Indian Penal Code, coming into effect in 2025.
Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) → A specialized police force in Maharashtra handling terrorism and national security threats.
Communist Party of India (Maoist) → A banned political group in India accused of armed rebellion and considered a security threat.
First Information Report (FIR) → The official police document starting a criminal investigation after reporting a crime in India.
This Article in a Nutshell
The arrest of Rejaz Sydeek under India’s UAPA law has stirred concerns about freedom of expression, legal fairness, and the criminalization of activism. His extended custody, controversial allegations, and student activism connections highlight ongoing national debates about anti-terror laws, political dissent, and the rights of journalists and protest leaders in India.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• India begins issuing e-passports in Chennai as national rollout starts
• Agents Charge Rs 60 Lakh to Enable Illegal Migration From India to West
• India Announces Visa Fee Waiver for Malaysians
