Key Takeaways
• Judge Christensen’s injunction protects two Montana State University students from losing visa status during ongoing litigation.
• The Trump administration revoked hundreds of international student visas in April 2025, often without clear explanation or due process.
• Over 70 international students in Michigan alone faced sudden visa removal, creating widespread uncertainty for universities nationwide.
A federal judge has granted a preliminary injunction that keeps two Montana State University graduate students from losing their visa status. This action stops the government from arresting, detaining, or moving the students out of Montana while their legal case is ongoing. The order, made on May 13, 2025, by U.S. District Court Judge Dana L. Christensen, turns a short-term emergency measure into a longer protection for these students. This important decision highlights the larger problem of how visa rules affect international students in the United States 🇺🇸, especially in stressful times.
How the Case Started
In April 2025, four students connected with the Montana University System had their visas suddenly revoked. Their records were removed from the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), a database that tracks international students for the government. When SEVIS records are terminated, students can lose their visa status right away. This puts them at risk of being sent back to their home countries. Two of the Montana students decided to fight back in federal court, with help from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Montana.
The Trump administration soon put the students back into the SEVIS system. Yet, the ACLU of Montana kept the lawsuit going. Their goal was to make sure the students would not face more sudden changes that could hurt their visa status. Alex Rate from the ACLU of Montana said the only way for these students to feel sure about their future was to get a clear order from the court. According to Rate, there had been “chaos and confusion” caused by the Trump administration’s actions.
What the Judge Decided
Judge Christensen’s 26-page ruling lays out the reasons for giving the preliminary injunction to protect the Montana State University students. He pointed to several key problems with how the Trump administration handled the visa changes:
- The administration did not follow its own rules or regulations when it removed the students from the SEVIS database. Judge Christensen called this action “arbitrary and capricious.” In simple terms, this means the decision was made without good reasons and without following proper steps.
- The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees many immigration matters, could not provide any clear information or schedule for their new policy. Because of this, the judge said a preliminary injunction was needed.
- Judge Christensen said that the changes made by the government “appear to fall squarely within the category of ‘easily abandoned or altered in the future’.” This means the policies could change at any time, making students’ situations even more uncertain.
Judge Christensen also compared the Montana case to a similar one in New Hampshire. There, a court found the government had not followed its own procedures and had failed to protect people’s due process rights. Due process is a basic legal right, meaning that the government must follow fair procedures before taking away someone’s status or rights.
Broader Background: A National Issue
The case of the Montana State University students is not an isolated event. It fits into a nationwide pattern where many international students have lost their visa status with little warning. In April 2025, the Trump administration started canceling the visas of hundreds of international students in different states. The impact has been major, especially for universities that depend on students from around the world.
Let’s look at some key numbers from Michigan:
- Michigan State University reported that 12 international students had their visas revoked.
- Wayne State University also said 12 students were affected in the same way.
- At the University of Michigan, 22 students lost their visas.
- In total, more than 70 international students in Michigan alone were suddenly facing removal from the country.
The government, led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio on this issue, confirmed that hundreds of visas had been revoked nationally. Many of the students caught up in this wave were targeted because they were thought to be involved in pro-Palestinian activism. However, the ACLU attorney in Michigan said that the four students they represented had not taken part in any political protests and did not have criminal records. This suggests that the visa changes may have been made too quickly and without enough evidence.
What the Court’s Decision Means for Students
The preliminary injunction ordered by Judge Christensen is a big deal for the two Montana State University graduate students at the heart of the case. Without this court order, they could have been arrested or forced to leave Montana. Their studies, friendships, and futures in the United States 🇺🇸 would have been disrupted, possibly forever. Now, because of the injunction, these students can remain in Montana while the legal issues are sorted out.
Akilah Deernose, the ACLU of Montana’s Executive Director, praised the ruling. She said the court had made it clear that the Trump administration could not “unilaterally circumvent the law and punish students who have followed all the rules by stripping them of their legal status, disrupting their studies, and putting them at risk of deportation.” This statement highlights how important it is for all international students to know that the rules will be followed and that they will be treated fairly.
For the two students at Montana State University, the ruling gives them the chance to finish their graduate programs. They also know that a court is watching over their situation and keeping the government from making sudden changes. For many other students in the United States 🇺🇸, the case shows that it is possible to push back, with help from groups like the ACLU, when visa status changes seem unfair or are not handled correctly.
The Importance of Following the Rules
One of the key issues in this case is the need for agencies like the Department of Homeland Security to follow their own guidelines. The court was clear that the government cannot just make major changes to visa status or SEVIS records without going through proper steps. If they do, they risk acting in a way that the law calls “arbitrary and capricious,” meaning their actions can be blocked by a judge.
Courts expect the government to have clear reasons for making big decisions that affect people’s lives. The lack of a clear policy and the failure to provide reasons for how SEVIS records were changed led Judge Christensen to grant the injunction. He saw this as the only way to stop further harm to the students until the case is finally decided.
The Problem of Uncertainty
International students often live with some uncertainty, but the events of April and May 2025 made things even harder. Imagine working for years to get admitted to a university like Montana State University, only to find that your visa status could be taken away at a moment’s notice. The students caught in this crisis did not know from day to day whether they would be able to continue their studies.
This kind of uncertainty can have a deep effect, not just on the students themselves, but also on the universities and communities that welcome them. Universities like Montana State University rely on international students for their skills, cultural knowledge, and tuition. Sudden changes in visa status threaten not just individual students but the whole system of higher education.
National and Local Impact
The preliminary injunction granted by Judge Christensen does more than help two students at Montana State University. It also sends a message to the federal government. The ruling reminds everyone that rules and proper procedures must be followed, especially in matters as serious as revoking someone’s legal right to stay in the United States 🇺🇸.
This case has also brought attention to the challenges faced by many other students across the nation. The fact that more than 70 students in Michigan alone were affected shows this is a broad issue. The story of the Montana State University students is now part of a much bigger debate about how international students are treated.
Universities and legal groups across the country have spoken out. Some, like Michigan State University and Wayne State University, have filed legal briefs and statements in support of students facing sudden visa loss. According to Akilah Deernose of the ACLU of Montana, holding the government accountable is necessary to protect the rights and futures of all students studying in the United States 🇺🇸.
Broader Lessons and Next Steps
The court’s decision in the Montana State University case offers some important lessons:
- Courts can provide temporary protection like a preliminary injunction to stop possible harm while bigger questions are worked out.
- Students and universities can challenge sudden visa status changes in court, especially when it appears that proper procedures have not been followed.
- The legal process can be slow and stressful, but it can also result in better protection and more clear rules for the future.
For the two students, the next steps will depend on how the lawsuit unfolds. The injunction keeps them safe for now, but the underlying problems about how visa decisions are made will have to be fixed as the case moves forward.
For other international students and universities, closely watching how agencies like the Department of Homeland Security carry out their roles is important. Making sure that all actions follow the proper rules and do not create unnecessary fear is the best way to build trust. More information about procedures and rights for international students can be found on the U.S. Department of State’s official student visa page, which is a helpful resource for anyone in similar situations.
A Word from VisaVerge.com
As reported by VisaVerge.com, stories like this one from Montana State University highlight the continuing need for transparency and fairness in government decisions about student visas. Many experts believe that clear communication and careful handling of visa status changes can help prevent confusion and protect students’ academic futures.
Final Thoughts
The preliminary injunction granted by Judge Christensen does more than pause possible deportations—it shows the importance of fair treatment and following established rules. International students from Montana State University and other schools affected by these visa changes can take comfort that courts are willing to act when they see that agencies have gone too far or acted without proper reasons.
This case is a reminder that students who come to the United States 🇺🇸 on a student visa deserve stability and clear processes, not sudden rule changes. As the lawsuit continues and similar stories come up in other states, universities, advocates, and courts will all have a role in making sure that students’ rights are respected.
Students facing questions about their visa status should always seek accurate information and, if necessary, legal help. Never assume a change in status is final until you have clear communications from both your school’s international office and official government sources. For up-to-date details on student visa requirements and related matters, visit the U.S. Department of State’s official website for student visas.
While the immediate goal is to stop harm to the two Montana State University students, the case stands as a symbol for many. It shows the need for proper rules and the vital role of the courts in making sure everyone gets fair treatment. For now, thanks to the preliminary injunction, the students can stay in Montana and continue their studies—at least until a final decision is made.
Learn Today
Preliminary Injunction → A temporary court order preventing certain government actions until the case is fully resolved.
SEVIS → The Student and Exchange Visitor Information System; tracks the visa status of international students in the U.S.
Arbitrary and Capricious → A legal standard; government actions made without reasonable justification or following required procedures.
Due Process → Legal right ensuring the government follows fair procedures before revoking someone’s status or rights.
Visa Revocation → When the government cancels a person’s visa, removing their legal right to stay in the country.
This Article in a Nutshell
A federal judge’s injunction halted the removal of two Montana State University graduate students’ visas, highlighting national issues in the handling of international student status. Lack of due process and arbitrary decisions by the Trump administration raised alarm among universities, with over 70 students affected in Michigan, emphasizing fair rule enforcement.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• US Immigration phone scam targets student visa holders nationwide
• Kazakhstan’s Golden Visa Program launches to attract global investors
• South Africa’s Tourism Slows Even After E-Visa System Launch
• Australia updates student visa rules for new applicants in 2025
• Hongkongers with BN(O) Visas voice unease over new UK settlement rules
