Key Takeaways
• Nine migrants died in ICE custody between January and May 2025 under Trump’s second term.
• ACLU found 95% of ICE deaths from 2017–2021 might have been preventable with proper medical care.
• ICE detention population grew from 41,000 to nearly 50,000 between February and May 2025.
Since January 2025, the second Trump administration has faced renewed and growing attention on the welfare of people held in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody. A recent official acknowledgment confirmed that nine migrants have died while held in ICE facilities since President Trump started his current term. The issue of migrant deaths, the conditions inside detention centers, and a heated budget argument now form the center of a wider debate about immigration policy in the United States 🇺🇸.
Nine Migrant Deaths in ICE Custody: Who, What, and When
Between January and early May 2025, at least nine migrants from different countries lost their lives while inside ICE custody. By early May, officials had recorded seven deaths. This number soon grew to nine, according to updated reports shared by the Trump administration. The deceased came from as far as Haiti 🇭🇹, Honduras 🇭🇳, Colombia 🇨🇴, the Dominican Republic 🇩🇴, Vietnam 🇻🇳, Ukraine 🇺🇦, and Ethiopia 🇪🇹. Each case highlights strong concerns about the state of federal immigration detention.
Here are some of the individuals whose deaths have come under the spotlight:
- Genry Ruiz Guillen, 29, died on January 23 at the Krome Service Processing Center in Florida.
- Serawit Gezahegn Dejene, 45, died January 29 at the Eloy Detention Center in Arizona.
- Maksym Chernayak, 44, died February 20 at the Krome Service Processing Center in Florida.
- Brayan Garzón-Rayo, 27, from Colombia 🇨🇴, died April 8 at Phelps County Jail in Missouri.
- Nhon Nguc Nguyen, 55, from Vietnam 🇻🇳, died April 16 at the El Paso Processing Center in Texas.
- Marie Ange Blaise, 44, from Haiti 🇭🇹, died April 25 at the Broward Transitional Center in Florida.
Each of these deaths did not just impact the families of the victims but also drew attention to the system itself and the people running it. Many questions now surround both the causes of these migrant deaths and how similar tragedies can be prevented in the future.
Detention Conditions: What’s Really Happening Inside ICE Facilities?
The deaths have led to repeated public calls for accountability and improvement. Many human rights groups, as well as immigrant advocates, charge that the conditions inside ICE custody centers are dangerous and even deadly.
A 2024 report by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) found that 95% of migrant deaths in ICE-run facilities from 2017 to 2021 might have been prevented if people had received proper medical care. This includes check-ups, emergency help, and necessary medicine or health services.
Main problems highlighted include:
- Medical neglect and lack of proper healthcare: Some reports from family, lawyers, and advocates suggest that many detainees did not get the care they needed, or had to wait too long.
- Overcrowding: Centers were reported to be 17% over their ideal capacity. In such cramped conditions, preventing the spread of illness and injuries becomes even harder.
- Unsanitary and harsh living conditions: In some places, people had to sleep on bare floors.
- Denial or delay of medical care: Examples include the case of Maksym Chernayak, where relatives and advocates claim Mr. Chernayak was refused the medical attention he pleaded for.
Representative Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, the only Haitian member of Congress, has openly questioned if ICE gave Marie Ange Blaise the help she needed. Reports state that Ms. Blaise, a 44-year-old Haitian woman, had complained of chest pain for hours before passing away at the Broward Transitional Center, but did not receive timely medical attention.
These details are part of a long-standing pattern—one that challenges ICE’s ability to provide for the health and dignity of those under its care.
Arguments Over Money: The ICE Budget Dispute
This series of reported migrant deaths in ICE custody comes as the Trump administration and Democratic lawmakers fight over the budget for immigration enforcement.
Democratic lawmakers argue that ICE is at risk of running out of funds. They say this is the result of the Trump administration’s aggressive tactics and rising costs, especially with more arrests and detentions.
Administration officials, on the other hand, push back against these claims. They deny that ICE is overspending or in immediate financial trouble. They say that their budgeting is sound and that the agency needs adequate funding for its expanding role under current policies.
These financial arguments are playing out as the government ramps up immigration enforcement in other ways:
- In the first 50 days of President Trump’s new term, ICE agents made 32,809 arrests. This number is almost the same as the total number of ICE arrests for the entire fiscal year 2024 – 33,242.
- As a result, more people are being detained, and ICE’s need for money is climbing, both for security and for basic services such as food, medical help, and shelter.
The budget debate is more than simply numbers on a page; it’s tied to whether ICE can care for those it detains safely and humanely while carrying out its mission.
Expansion Plans and Their Effects
During President Trump’s second term, ICE has increased efforts to hold more migrants. In February 2025, ICE reported just over 41,000 people in custody. By May, that number had risen to almost 50,000. This large jump has caught the eye of both supporters and critics.
Looking ahead, the Trump administration is pushing a plan that could triple the total detention capacity. Some see this as a way to strengthen immigration law. But immigrant advocates, and some officials, warn it could make bad situations worse.
They point to the fact that, even with the present numbers, many facilities are stretched beyond their limits. They fear that further increases will:
- Lead to greater overcrowding,
- Increase the risk of disease spread,
- Put more strain on already limited medical services,
- And raise costs for U.S. taxpayers.
Worries about these risks have only grown since news broke of repeated deaths in ICE custody. Many are asking whether the government can guarantee everyone’s safety as more people are added to these centers.
What Critics and Supporters Say
The arguments over ICE custody, migrant deaths, and the Trump administration’s policy changes reflect wide divisions in the U.S. public and political leaders.
Human rights groups and advocates say the issue is urgent. They argue that:
- Each death is a sign the system is not working.
- Overcrowding, poor healthcare, and lack of staff training are causing preventable loss of life.
- The government should seek out alternatives to detention, such as supervised release or ankle bracelets, instead of expanding costly facilities.
They point out findings like the ACLU’s, which say most deaths at ICE centers could have been prevented with better medical care.
Supporters of President Trump’s policies, however, see strong enforcement and expanded detention as vital for national security and the rule of law. They argue:
- That ICE officers are doing their best with the resources available,
- That the number of deaths must be understood in the context of tens of thousands held,
- That tighter rules and faster removal of people without legal status are needed to protect the country.
The Trump administration also rejects Democratic claims about overspending, stating they are committed to managing funds well as they expand enforcement efforts.
Impact on Migrants, Families, and Taxpayers
The direct impact of these migrant deaths in ICE custody falls mainly on the victims themselves and their families. However, the effects ripple out to touch many groups:
- Migrants in detention: Each new report of a death creates fear among those currently in the system. Concerns about their own safety and well-being grow as they hear of cases where people did not get the care they needed.
- Family members and loved ones: Families must cope not only with loss but also with uncertainty. Many report receiving little information about what happened to their loved ones or why help was not provided more quickly.
- Local communities: Some communities worry about the effects of large, growing detention centers in their area. They fear that local hospitals and services could be stretched thin if ICE facilities continue to expand.
- Taxpayers: As ICE’s budget requests increase, the cost of detention rises. Critics say spending money to detain more people is less effective than other immigration approaches, but defenders believe these measures are worth the cost for national security.
History and Background: Patterns Under Scrutiny
Deaths inside ICE custody, concerns about medical care, and budget disputes are not new. They have followed immigration policy for years, under several administrations.
- From 2017 to 2021, data and analysis, including work cited by the ACLU, show that almost all deaths in ICE custody happened after delays or failures in medical care.
- Reports of overcrowding and people sleeping on floors have surfaced many times, with periodic government reviews ordering improvements at some centers.
- Budget showdowns over immigration enforcement have been common as well, with lawmakers from both parties disagreeing over how much money should go to ICE and what changes, if any, are needed for its operations.
With President Trump’s renewed focus on enforcement, these recurring problems have grown. The facing of new deaths, paired with a more forceful detention plan, is now a leading issue in the debate over U.S. immigration policy.
What Can Be Done? Calls for Change
Given these patterns, many groups and lawmakers are asking for both immediate and long-term changes.
Immediate steps suggested by advocates:
– Boost funding for health services, including more doctors and nurses in detention centers,
– Give staff better training on how to spot and respond to medical emergencies,
– Open up centers to independent inspections and allow outside reviewers to check on conditions.
Longer term, wider changes could include:
– Ending the use of detention for many people, especially those with health problems,
– Using technology and regular check-ins instead of keeping so many people behind bars,
– Reviewing all past deaths and causes so mistakes are not repeated,
– Creating ways for families to get information quickly if something goes wrong.
Advocates stress that these steps must happen fast, before more lives are lost. While the debate continues, every new death in ICE custody adds pressure for action.
What the Government Says: Response from Officials
President Trump’s administration stands firm in its support for current policies, including detention expansion. Officials claim that most facilities are safe and that people get needed care. They dispute the idea that ICE is spending beyond its means.
They acknowledge that any death in ICE custody is a tragedy, but stress that their steps are vital for enforcing immigration laws and border safety. The administration promises continued review of deaths and facility operations. It also aims to provide more details publicly, while standing against what it calls “political attacks” from lawmakers who want to shrink enforcement budgets.
Full official information about ICE operations, standards for detention, and rules on medical care can be found on the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement website.
Looking Forward: The Road Ahead
As the Trump administration moves forward with its plan to expand detention, the number of people held in ICE custody may keep rising. Whether this leads to more migrant deaths or improved safety depends on how quickly changes are made to address known weaknesses.
The upcoming budget debate in Congress will play a large role in shaping ICE’s next steps. Lawmakers and the public will likely keep asking: Does expanding detention keep the United States 🇺🇸 safer, or does it bring unacceptable cost and risk to those inside these facilities?
VisaVerge.com’s investigation reveals a strong link between overcrowding, lack of medical care, and preventable loss of life. The facts suggest that even with new leadership and more funding, ICE still faces deep-rooted challenges—ones that won’t vanish unless serious reforms are made.
For now, these deaths serve as a sobering reminder of the human costs at the heart of every immigration decision, and why close watching of ICE custody, migrant deaths, and budget choices under President Trump will remain crucial as the debate continues.
Learn Today
ICE Custody → Detainment of migrants by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, pending review of their immigration or asylum status.
ACLU → American Civil Liberties Union, a nonprofit focusing on defending civil rights and liberties in the United States.
Overcrowding → A situation where detention centers hold more people than designed, leading to unsanitary and unsafe conditions.
Medical Neglect → Failure to provide essential medical attention or timely healthcare to detainees in ICE facilities.
Detention Capacity → The number of beds or spaces available in immigration detention centers for holding people in custody.
This Article in a Nutshell
Nine migrant deaths in ICE custody since January 2025 have reignited debate on detention conditions and government responsibility. Rising overcrowding, medical neglect, and expanding detention under Trump’s administration highlight urgent calls for reform, improved oversight, and humane alternatives—especially as ICE pushes to triple its total detention capacity nationwide.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Qatari Jet Sparks Uproar as Trump’s Air Force One Pick
• Trump Revives ‘Operation Wetback’ With Million-Deportation Goal
• Trump Administration Unleashes ‘Secret Weapon’ on Activist Judges
• White South African Refugees Get Trump’s Special Welcome in Iowa
• Trump Supreme Court Challenge Targets Birthright Citizenship
